Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27539401›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis.

Aaron J Krych, Ayoosh Pareek, Alexander H King, Nick R Johnson, Michael J Stuart, Riley J Williams

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The cost-effectiveness of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. [Advances in clinical repair techniques for localized knee cartilage lesions].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron J KrychDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Krych.Aaron@Mayo.edu.
Ayoosh PareekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alexander H KingDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nick R JohnsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michael J StuartDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Riley J WilliamsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Institute for Cartilage Repair, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOptimal surgical treatment of chondral defects in an athletic population remains highly controversial and has yet to be determined. The purpose of this review was to (1) report data on return to sport and (2) compare activity and functional outcome measures following various cartilage restoration techniques.

methodsA comprehensive review was performed for studies with return-to-sport outcomes after microfracture (MFX), osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT), osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). All studies containing return-to-sport participation with minimum 2-year post-operative activity-based outcomes were included. A meta-analysis comparing rate of return to sport between each surgical intervention was conducted using a random-effects model.

resultsForty-four studies met inclusion criteria (18 Level I/II, 26 Level III/IV). In total, 2549 patients were included (1756 M, 793 F) with an average age of 35 years and follow-up of 47 months. Return to sport at some level was 76 % overall, with highest rates of return after OAT (93 %), followed by OCA (88 %), ACI (82 %), and MFX (58 %). Osteochondral autograft transfer showed the fastest return to sports (5.2 ± 1.8 months) compared to 9.1 ± 2.2 months for MFX, 9.6 ± 3.0 months for OCA and 11.8 ± 3.8 months for ACI (P < 0.001). A meta-regression was conducted due to heterogeneity in preoperative factors such as patient age, lesion size, and preoperative Tegner score. None of these factors were found to be significant determinants for rate of return to sport.

conclusionIn conclusion, in this meta-analysis of 2549 athletes, cartilage restoration surgery had a 76 % return to sport at mid-term follow-up. Osteochondral autograft transfer offered a faster recovery and appeared to have a higher rate of return to preinjury athletics, but heterogeneity in lesion size, athlete age, and concomitant surgical procedures are important factors to consider when assessing individual athletes. This study reports on the rate of return to sport in athletes undergoing various procedures for symptomatic chondral defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresReturn to SportAthletic InjuriesCartilage, ArticularHumansKnee InjuriesKnee JointModels, StatisticalRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeAutologous chondrocyte implantationCartilageMicrofractureOsteochondral allograft transplantationOsteochondral autograft transferReturn to sport

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.