ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2017
Radiation Dosimetry of a Novel Adenosine A
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biodistribution and dosimetry of the PET radioligand [EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Comparison of absorbed dose extrapolation methods for mouse-to-human translation of radiolabelled macromolecules.EJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Allosteric Interactions between Adenosine AInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Acute Rodent Tolerability, Toxicity, and Radiation Dosimetry Estimates of the S1P1-Specific Radioligand [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Review
- Chemical Probes for the Adenosine Receptors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Tracers for non-invasive radionuclide imaging of immune checkpoint expression in cancer.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose[ PROCEDURES: Male Wistar rats (n = 35) were i.v. injected with [
resultsPET-imaging and organ-harvesting estimated comparable organ RTs, with differences of 6-27 %, except for the lungs, pancreas, and urinary bladder, with differences of 48, 53, and 60, respectively. The critical organ was the small intestine with a dose of 25 μSv/MBq. The effective doses (EDs) calculated from imaging-based and organ-harvesting-derived data were 5.5 and 5.6 μSv/MBq, respectively, using the International Commission on Radiological Protection 60 tissue weighting factors.
conclusionsThe ED of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.