Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27538896›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Effects of a high-intensity interval training program versus a moderate-intensity continuous training program on maximal oxygen uptake and blood pressure in healthy adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Víctor Hugo Arboleda Serna, Elkin Fernando Arango Vélez, Rubén Darío Gómez Arias, Yuri Feito

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02288403 (Effects of a High-intensity Interval Training Program Compared to a Moderate Intensity Program in Adults 18-44 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02288403 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of a High-intensity Interval Training Program Compared to a Moderate Intensity Program in Adults 18-44 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AntioquiaRan2015 to 2016Enrolled44ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsAerobic interval training, Continuous training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Víctor Hugo Arboleda SernaGrupo de Investigación en Actividad Física para la Salud (AFIS), Instituto de Educación Física, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Elkin Fernando Arango VélezGrupo de Investigación en Actividad Física para la Salud (AFIS), Instituto de Educación Física, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Rubén Darío Gómez AriasFacultad Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín, Colombia.
Yuri FeitoDepartment of Exercise Science & Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, 520 Parliament Garden Way, NW, MD 4104, Kennesaw, GA, USA. yfeito@kennesaw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6790-6294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipation in aerobic exercise generates increased cardiorespiratory fitness, which results in a protective factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. High-intensity interval training might cause higher increases in cardiorespiratory fitness in comparison with moderate-intensity continuous training; nevertheless, current evidence is not conclusive. To our knowledge, this is the first study to test the effect of high-intensity interval training with total load duration of 7.5 min per session.

methodsA randomized controlled trial will be performed on two groups of healthy, sedentary male volunteers (n = 44). The study protocol will include 24 exercise sessions, three times a week, including aerobic training on a treadmill and strength training exercises. The intervention group will perform 15 bouts of 30 s, each at an intensity between 90 % and 95 % of maximal heart rate. The control group will complete 40 min of continuous exercise, ranging between 65 % and 75 % of maximal heart rate. The primary outcome measure to be evaluated will be maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be evaluated as secondary outcome measures. Waist circumference, body mass index, and body composition will also be evaluated. DISCUSSION: Epidemiological evidence shows the link between VO2max and its association with chronic conditions that trigger CVD. Therefore, finding ways to improve VO2max and reduce blood pressure it is of vital importance to public health.

trial registrationNCT02288403 . Registered on 4 November 2014.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood PressureBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCardiovascular DiseasesHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionResistance TrainingSedentary BehaviorStatistics, NonparametricWaist CircumferenceBlood pressureExerciseHigh-intensity interval trainingRandomized controlled trialVO2max

Identifiers

PMID27538896
PMCPMC4991073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.