ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2017
GPU-based RFA simulation for minimally invasive cancer treatment of liver tumours.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of in silico planning and real-time simulation of hepatic radiofrequency ablation (ClinicIMPPACT Trial).European radiology · 2020Trial
- Computer-assisted Treatment Planning and Mathematical Modeling for Percutaneous Liver Tumor Ablation: An Updated Survey.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Computer-assisted Treatment Planning and Mathematical Modeling for Percutaneous Liver Tumor Ablation: An Updated Survey.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Heat: high-efficiency simulation for thermal ablation therapy.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Validation of Software for Patient-Specific Real-Time Simulation of Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation.Academic radiology · 2022Article
- Software-based planning of ultrasound and CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in hepatic tumors.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Multiple objective planning for thermal ablation of liver tumors.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020Article
- GPU-based 3D iceball modeling for fast cryoablation simulation and planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2019Article
- RFA Guardian: Comprehensive Simulation of Radiofrequency Ablation Treatment of Liver Tumors.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A prospective development study of software-guided radio-frequency ablation of primary and secondary liver tumors: Clinical intervention modelling, planning and proof for ablation cancer treatment (ClinicIMPPACT).Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the most popular and well-standardized minimally invasive cancer treatments (MICT) for liver tumours, employed where surgical resection has been contraindicated. Less-experienced interventional radiologists (IRs) require an appropriate planning tool for the treatment to help avoid incomplete treatment and so reduce the tumour recurrence risk. Although a few tools are available to predict the ablation lesion geometry, the process is computationally expensive. Also, in our implementation, a few patient-specific parameters are used to improve the accuracy of the lesion prediction.
methodsAdvanced heterogeneous computing using personal computers, incorporating the graphics processing unit (GPU) and the central processing unit (CPU), is proposed to predict the ablation lesion geometry. The most recent GPU technology is used to accelerate the finite element approximation of Penne's bioheat equation and a three state cell model. Patient-specific input parameters are used in the bioheat model to improve accuracy of the predicted lesion.
resultsA fast GPU-based RFA solver is developed to predict the lesion by doing most of the computational tasks in the GPU, while reserving the CPU for concurrent tasks such as lesion extraction based on the heat deposition at each finite element node. The solver takes less than 3 min for a treatment duration of 26 min. When the model receives patient-specific input parameters, the deviation between real and predicted lesion is below 3 mm.
conclusionA multi-centre retrospective study indicates that the fast RFA solver is capable of providing the IR with the predicted lesion in the short time period before the intervention begins when the patient has been clinically prepared for the treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27538836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.