Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27538810›Full record

GuidelinePractical radiation oncology

Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Monica Morrow, Kimberly J Van Zee, Lawrence J Solin, Nehmat Houssami, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Jay R Harris, Janet Horton, Shelley Hwang, Peggy L Johnson, M Luke Marinovich and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Practical radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effectiveness of mat pilates on fatigue in women with breast cancer submitted to adjuvant radiotherapy: randomized controlled clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Monica MorrowBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: morrowm@mskcc.org.
Kimberly J Van ZeeBreast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Lawrence J SolinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA.
Nehmat HoussamiScreening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Mariana Chavez-MacGregorDepartments of Medical Oncology and Health Service Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jay R HarrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Janet HortonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Peggy L JohnsonAdvocate in Science, Susan G. Komen.
M Luke MarinovichScreening and Test Evaluation Program (STEP), Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.
Stuart J SchnittDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Irene WapnirDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Meena S MoranDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeControversy exists regarding the optimal negative margin width for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multidisciplinary consensus panel used a meta-analysis of margin width and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) from a systematic review of 20 studies including 7883 patients and other published literature as the evidence base for consensus.

resultsNegative margins halve the risk of IBTR compared with positive margins defined as ink on DCIS. A 2-mm margin minimizes the risk of IBTR compared with smaller negative margins. More widely clear margins do not significantly decrease IBTR compared with 2-mm margins. Negative margins narrower than 2 mm alone are not an indication for mastectomy, and factors known to affect rates of IBTR should be considered in determining the need for re-excision.

conclusionUse of a 2-mm margin as the standard for an adequate margin in DCIS treated with whole-breast irradiation is associated with lower rates of IBTR and has the potential to decrease re-excision rates, improve cosmetic outcomes, and decrease health care costs. Clinical judgment should be used in determining the need for further surgery in patients with negative margins narrower than 2 mm.

Indexed as

BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingRadiation OncologySurgical OncologyAdultConsensusFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27538810
PMCPMC5070537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.