ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
CloneCNA: detecting subclonal somatic copy number alterations in heterogeneous tumor samples from whole-exome sequencing data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid and reproducible karyotyping with long-read sequencing in patients with AML.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Genome engineering on size reduction and complexity simplification: A review.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- Identification of Copy Number Alterations from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- LiquidCNA: Tracking subclonal evolution from longitudinal liquid biopsies using somatic copy number alterations.iScience · 2021Article
- HBOS-CNV: A New Approach to Detect Copy Number Variations From Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A Density Peak-Based Method to Detect Copy Number Variations From Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Decomposing the subclonal structure of tumors with two-way mixture models on copy number aberrations.PloS one · 2018Article
- TargetClone: A multi-sample approach for reconstructing subclonal evolution of tumors.PloS one · 2018Article
- Evolutionary scalpels for dissecting tumor ecosystems.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017Review
- A population genetics perspective on the determinants of intra-tumor heterogeneity.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2017Review
- An Improved Binary Differential Evolution Algorithm to Infer Tumor Phylogenetic Trees.BioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCopy number alteration is a main genetic structural variation that plays an important role in tumor initialization and progression. Accurate detection of copy number alterations is necessary for discovering cancer-causing genes. Whole-exome sequencing has become a widely used technology in the last decade for detecting various types of genomic aberrations in cancer genomes. However, there are several major issues encountered in these detection problems, including normal cell contamination, tumor aneuploidy, and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Especially, deciphering the intra-tumor heterogeneity is imperative for identifying clonal and subclonal copy number alterations.
resultsWe introduce CloneCNA, a novel bioinformatics tool for efficiently addressing these issues and automatically detecting clonal and subclonal somatic copy number alterations from heterogeneous tumor samples. CloneCNA fully explores the log ratio of read counts between paired tumor-normal samples and tumor B allele frequency of germline heterozygous SNP positions, further employs efficient statistical models to quantitatively represent copy number status of tumor sample containing multiple clones. We examine CloneCNA on simulated heterogeneous and real tumor samples, and the results demonstrate that CloneCNA has higher power to detect copy number alterations than existing methods.
conclusionsCloneCNA, a novel algorithm is developed to efficiently and accurately identify somatic copy number alterations from heterogeneous tumor samples. We demonstrate the statistical framework of CloneCNA represents a remarkable advance for tumor whole-exome sequencing data. We expect that CloneCNA will promote cancer-focused studies for investigating the role of clonal evolution and elucidating critical events benefiting tumor tumourigenesis and progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.