Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27538488›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

Cefmetazole for bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae comparing with carbapenems.

Takahiko Fukuchi, Kentaro Iwata, Saori Kobayashi, Tatsuya Nakamura, Goh Ohji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiko FukuchiDivision of Infectious Diseases Therapeutics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan. chicco@f.email.ne.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-1653
Kentaro IwataDivision of Infectious Diseases Therapeutics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Saori KobayashiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Tatsuya NakamuraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-2 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Goh OhjiDivision of Infectious Diseases Therapeutics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kobe University Hospital · JPKobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundESBL (Extended spectrum beta-lactamase) producing enterobacteriaceae are challenging organisms with little treatment options. Carbapenems are frequently used, but the emergence of carbapenem resistant enterobacteriaceae is a concerning issue, which may hinder the use of carbapenems. Although cephamycins such as cefoxitin, cefmetazole or cefotetan are effective against ESBL-producers in vitro, there are few clinical data demonstrating effects against bacteremia caused by these organisms.

methodsWe performed a retrospective observational study on cases of bacteremia caused by ESBL-producers to investigate the efficacy of cefmetazole compared with carbapenems. We also evaluated whether the trend of antibiotic choice changed over years.

resultsSixty-nine patients (male 34, age 69.2 ± 14.4), including two relapse cases, were reviewed for this analysis. The most common causative organisms were Escherichia coli (64, 93 %), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca (2 each, 4 %). The group that received carbapenem therapy (43, 62 %) had increased severity in the Pittsburgh Bacteremic score than the group that received cefmetazole therapy, (1.5 ± 1.5 vs 2.5 ± 2.1, p = 0.048), while analysis of other factors didn't reveal any statistical differences. Five patients in the carbapenem group and one patient in the cefmetazole group died during the observation period (p = 0.24). CTX-M-9 were predominant in this series (59 %). Infectious disease physicians initially recommended carbapenems at the beginning of the current research period, which gradually changed over time favoring the use of cefmetazole instead (p = 0.002).

conclusionCefmetazole may be safely given to patients with bacteremia caused by ESBL-producers as a definitive therapy, if one can select out relatively stable patients.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefmetazoleDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliFemaleHumansKlebsiella oxytocaKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCefmetazoleBacteremiaCefmetazoleCephamycinESBLExtended spectrum beta-lactamase

Identifiers

PMID27538488
PMCPMC4991070
OpenAlexW2513943590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.