Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27538438›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Diarrhea management in children under five in sub-Saharan Africa: does the source of care matter? A Countdown analysis.

Liliana Carvajal-Vélez, Agbessi Amouzou, Jamie Perin, Abdoulaye Maïga, Hayalnesh Tarekegn, Akanni Akinyemi, Solomon Shiferaw, Mark Young, Jennifer Bryce, Holly Newby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Liliana Carvajal-VélezUnited Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York City, NY, 10017, USA. liliana.carvajal.a@gmail.com.
Agbessi AmouzouUnited Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York City, NY, 10017, USA.
Jamie PerinJohns Hopkins University, International Health, Baltimore, USA.
Abdoulaye MaïgaUniversité catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Hayalnesh TarekegnUnited Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York City, NY, 10017, USA.
Akanni AkinyemiObafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria.
Solomon ShiferawAddis Ababa University, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mark YoungUnited Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York City, NY, 10017, USA.
Jennifer BryceJohns Hopkins University, International Health, Baltimore, USA.
Holly NewbyUnited Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York City, NY, 10017, USA.
United Nations Children's Fund · USJohns Hopkins University · USAddis Ababa University · ETObafemi Awolowo University · NGUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiarrhea remains a high burden disease, responsible for nine percent of deaths in children under five globally. We analyzed diarrhea management practices in young children and their association with the source of care.

methodsWe used Demographic and Health Survey data from 12 countries in sub-Saharan Africa with high burdens of childhood diarrhea. We classified the quality of diarrhea management practices as good, fair, or poor based on mothers' reports for children with diarrhea, using WHO/UNICEF recommendations for appropriate treatment. We described the prevalence of diarrhea management by type and assessed the association between good management and source of care, adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsPrevalence of good diarrhea management is low in 11 of the 12 analyzed surveys, varying from 17 % in Cote d'Ivoire to 38 % in Niger. The exception is Sierra Leone, where prevalence of good practice is 67 %. Prevalence of good management was low even among children taken to health facilities [median 52 %, range: 34-64 %]. Diarrhea careseeking from health facilities or community providers was associated with higher odds of good management than care from traditional/informal sources or no care. Careseeking from facilities did not result systematically in a higher likelihood of good diarrhea management than care from community providers. The odds of good diarrhea management were similar for community versus facility providers in six countries, higher in community than facility providers in two countries, and higher in facility than in community providers in four countries.

conclusionMany children's lives can be saved with correct management of childhood diarrhea. Too many children are not receiving adequate care for diarrhea in high-burden sub-Saharan African countries, even among those seen in health facilities. Redoubling efforts to increase careseeking and improve quality of care for childhood diarrhea in both health facilities and at community level is an urgent priority.

Indexed as

Africa, NorthernAfrica South of the SaharaChild, PreschoolCommunity Health ServicesCote d'IvoireDelivery of Health CareDiarrheaDisease ManagementFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth SurveysHumansInfantMothersNigerPrevalenceChild healthDiarrheaHealth providersHousehold surveysOral rehydration salts

Identifiers

PMID27538438
PMCPMC4991040
OpenAlexW2517537585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.