Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27537913›Full record

ArticleToxins2016

Cyanobacterial Neurotoxin BMAA and Mercury in Sharks.

Neil Hammerschlag, David A Davis, Kiyo Mondo, Matthew S Seely, Susan J Murch, William Broc Glover, Timothy Divoll, David C Evers, Deborah C Mash

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Environmental Neurotoxin β-Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neil HammerschlagRosensteil School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA. nhammerschlag@rsmas.miami.edu.
David A DavisDepartment of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA. d.davis12@med.miami.edu.
Kiyo MondoDepartment of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA. kmondo@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Matthew S SeelyDepartment of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA. mxs1904@miami.edu.
Susan J MurchDepartment of Chemistry, 3247 University Way, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada. susan.murch@ubc.ca.
William Broc GloverDepartment of Chemistry, 3247 University Way, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada. williambrocglover@gmail.com.
Timothy DivollBiodiversity Research Institute, 276 Canco Road, Portland, ME 04103, USA. tim.divoll@briloon.org.
David C EversBiodiversity Research Institute, 276 Canco Road, Portland, ME 04103, USA. david.evers@briloon.org.
Deborah C MashDepartment of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA. dmash@med.miami.edu.
University of Miami · USBiodiversity Research Institute · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharks have greater risk for bioaccumulation of marine toxins and mercury (Hg), because they are long-lived predators. Shark fins and cartilage also contain β-N-methylamino-l-alanine (BMAA), a ubiquitous cyanobacterial toxin linked to neurodegenerative diseases. Today, a significant number of shark species have found their way onto the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. Many species of large sharks are threatened with extinction due in part to the growing high demand for shark fin soup and, to a lesser extent, for shark meat and cartilage products. Recent studies suggest that the consumption of shark parts may be a route to human exposure of marine toxins. Here, we investigated BMAA and Hg concentrations in fins and muscles sampled in ten species of sharks from the South Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. BMAA was detected in all shark species with only seven of the 55 samples analyzed testing below the limit of detection of the assay. Hg concentrations measured in fins and muscle samples from the 10 species ranged from 0.05 to 13.23 ng/mg. These analytical test results suggest restricting human consumption of shark meat and fins due to the high frequency and co-occurrence of two synergistic environmental neurotoxic compounds.

Indexed as

Food ContaminationSeafoodAmino Acids, DiaminoAnimal FinsAnimalsBody BurdenChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidCyanobacteria ToxinsHumansMethylmercury CompoundsMusclesRisk AssessmentSharksSpectrometry, FluorescenceTandem Mass SpectrometryAmino Acids, Diaminobeta-N-methylamino-L-alanineCyanobacteria ToxinsMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, Chemicalconservationcyanobacteria">l-alaninemethylmercuryneurodegenerative diseaseneurotoxinsharkstotal mercuryβ-N-methylamino-

Identifiers

PMID27537913
PMCPMC4999854
OpenAlexW2512430913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.