Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27537382›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

Role of histological regression grade after two neoadjuvant approaches with or without radiotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Patricia Martin-Romano, Jose J Sola, Juan A Diaz-Gonzalez, Ana Chopitea, Yohana Iragorri, Fernando Martínez-Regueira, Mariano Ponz-Sarvise, Leire Arbea, Jose C Subtil, David Cano and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Patricia Martin-RomanoDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Jose J SolaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital San Pedro, Logroño 26006, Spain.
Juan A Diaz-GonzalezDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Ana ChopiteaDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Yohana IragorriDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Fernando Martínez-RegueiraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Mariano Ponz-SarviseDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Leire ArbeaDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Jose C SubtilDepartment of Gastroenterology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
David CanoDepartment of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Lucia CenicerosDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Jairo LegaspiDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Jose Luis HernandezDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.
Javier RodríguezDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona 31008, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe degree of histopathological response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) is a key determinant of patients' long-term outcome. We aimed to assess the pattern of histopathological regression after two neoadjuvant approaches and its impact on survival times.

methodsRegression grade of the primary tumour (Becker criteria) and the degree of nodal response by a 4-point scale (grades A-D) were assessed. Grade A-true negative lymph nodes (LNs); grade B and C-infiltrated LNs with any or little evidence of nodal response; and grade D-complete pathological response in a previously infiltrated LN. A favourable pathological response was defined as Becker Ia-b and grade D.

resultsFrom 2004 to 2014, 80 patients with GC (cT3-4/N+ by CT-scan/EUS) were treated with either preoperative chemotherapy (ChT, n=34) or chemoradiation (CRT, n=46). Patients in the CRT group had a higher likelihood of achieving a Becker Ia-b response (58 vs 32%, P=0.001), a grade D nodal regression (30 vs 6%, P=0.009) and a favourable pathological response (23 vs 3%; P=0.019). Patients with a grade D nodal response had a longer 5-year PFS and OS compared with those with a grade B or C response. Patients with a baseline negative LN status had similar outcomes irrespective of the preoperative therapy received (5-year OS; ChT vs CRT, 58 vs 51%, P=0.92).

conclusionsPreoperative chemoradiation increases the likelihood of achieving favourable histopathological features that correlate with a 5-year OS>70% in GC patients.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAstheniaCapecitabineDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelFemaleFluorouracilGastrectomyGastrointestinal DiseasesCapecitabineDocetaxelFluorouracilOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinPaclitaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID27537382
PMCPMC5023782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.