Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536999›Full record

Trial reportPsychological assessment2016

Multilevel factor analysis of smokers' real-time negative affect ratings while quitting.

Krysten W Bold, Katie Witkiewitz, Danielle E McCarthy

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological assessment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Impact of Coping With Stressful Events on Negative Affect and Cravings Among Smokers With Mood Disorders.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Trial
  3. An experimental investigation into the effect of negative affect on the behavioral economic demand for alcohol.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krysten W BoldDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Katie WitkiewitzDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico.
Danielle E McCarthyDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Research Training Program in Substance Use PreventionT32DA019426 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMI P SULLIVAN · 2005 to 2026
$7.5M
Phenotypic Markers for Smoking Cessation: Impulsive Choice and Impulsive ActionRC1DA028129 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MCCARTHY, DANIELLE ERIN · 2009 to 2010
$734k
NIDA NIH HHS RC1 DA028129NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA019426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking is a serious public health problem, and accurate real-time assessment of risk factors associated with smoking is critical to understanding smoking relapse. Negative affect is often described as a critical risk factor related to smoking relapse, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods have been widely used to study real-time relations between negative affect and smoking. However, the factor structure of momentary negative affect ratings is unknown. The current investigation examined the multilevel factor structure and internal consistency of an EMA measure of negative affect. Daily assessments were collected for 1 week prequit and 3 weeks postquit from 113 adult daily smokers receiving nicotine replacement therapy and counseling to quit smoking. Results supported a 2-factor model with correlated but distinct agitation and distress factors, rather than a single-factor model of negative affect. The agitation factor was indicated by these items: impatient, tense/anxious, restless. The distress factor was indicated by these items: sad/depressed, upset, distressed. The 2-factor model had acceptable model fit and consistent factor loadings across 3 separate cessation phases: prequit, postquit with recent smoking, and postquit without recent smoking. The 2 factors were highly correlated, showed good internal consistency, and showed strong associations with theoretically relevant smoking and affect variables. Agitation was more strongly related to urge to smoke, and distress was more strongly related to recent stress. This study provides support for a 2-factor model of an EMA measure of negative affect and highlights distinct facets that may be useful for future investigations of affect and smoking. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentPsychological TestsSelf ReportAdultAnxietyCombined Modality TherapyCounselingFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalMultilevel AnalysisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID27536999
PMCPMC4991557
OpenAlexW2512166940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.