Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536808›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2016

Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis: An Updated Systematic Review.

Gowri Raman, Gaelen P Adam, Christopher W Halladay, Valerie N Langberg, Ijeoma A Azodo, Ethan M Balk

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vascular Closure Devices For Axillary Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Procedural trends and event rates in severe renovascular hypertension.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gowri RamanFrom Tufts Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Gaelen P AdamFrom Tufts Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Christopher W HalladayFrom Tufts Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Valerie N LangbergFrom Tufts Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ijeoma A AzodoFrom Tufts Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ethan M BalkFrom Tufts Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Brown University · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) is associated with high blood pressure (BP), decreased kidney function, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and death. PURPOSE: To compare benefits and harms of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty with stent placement (PTRAS) versus medical therapy alone in adults with ARAS. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1993 to 16 March 2016; gray literature; and prior systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); nonrandomized, comparative studies (NRCSs); single-group studies; and selected case reports that reported all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, RRT, kidney function, BP, and adverse events. DATA EXTRACTION: Six researchers extracted data on design, interventions, outcomes, and study quality into a Web-based database. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighty-three studies met eligibility criteria. In 5 of 7 RCTs, PTRAS and medical therapy led to similar BP control in patients with ARAS, and no RCTs showed statistically significant differences in kidney function, mortality, RRT, cardiovascular events, or pulmonary edema. Eight NRCSs had more variable results, finding mostly no significant differences in mortality, RRT, or cardiovascular events but heterogeneous effects on kidney function and BP. Procedure-related adverse events were rare, and medication-related adverse events were not reported. Two RCTs found no patient characteristics that were associated with outcomes with either PTRAS or medical therapy. Single-group studies found various but inconsistent factors that predict outcomes. Case reports provided examples of clinical improvement after PTRAS in patients with acute decompensation. LIMITATION: Limited clinical applicability and power in RCTs, and possible publication bias and lack of adjusted analyses in NRCSs.

conclusionThe strength of evidence regarding the relative benefits and harms of PTRAS versus medical therapy alone for patients with ARAS is low. Studies have generally focused on patients with less severe ARAS. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Indexed as

AdultAngioplastyAntihypertensive AgentsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansHypertensionRenal Artery ObstructionRenal InsufficiencyStentsAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID27536808
OpenAlexW2473372812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.