Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536738›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2016

Exit interviews administered to patients participating in the COSTOP placebo controlled randomised trial in Uganda.

Andrew Nunn, Zacchaeus Anywaine, Janet Seeley, Paula Munderi, Jonathan Levin, Ronnie Kasirye, Anatoli Kamali, Andrew Abaasa, Heiner Grosskurth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew NunnMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Zacchaeus AnywaineMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Janet SeeleyMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paula MunderiMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Jonathan LevinMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Ronnie KasiryeMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Anatoli KamaliMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Andrew AbaasaMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Heiner GrosskurthMRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700837Medical Research Council MC_EX_UU_G0902150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCOSTOP was a randomised controlled trial designed to assess the risks and benefits to HIV-infected participants stabilised on anti-retroviral treatment of stopping cotrimoxazole (CTX). In order to assess the extent to which patients may have had access to and used CTX other than that supplied as study drug it was decided to conduct an exit interview.

methodsA structured interview was administered by interviewers who were not associated with the COSTOP trial team in order to make it easier for participants to respond truthfully to sensitive questions about adherence to the study protocol.

resultsA total of 1993 participants were interviewed. Only 29 (1.7%) said they had taken their left over CTX; 101 (6.1%) had kept supplies at home. When asked about obtaining open label CTX during the trial 92 (4.7%) participants said they had done so, in contrast to only 12 who admitted doing so when asked at trial visits. The questions participants found most difficult to answer honestly at clinic visits were those concerning adherence to trial drugs (15.6% of participants) and whether they had slept under the insecticide treated mosquito nets (14.9%). DISCUSSION: The exit interview demonstrated that there was some evidence of open label drug being taken by the participants. However, the results from the interview do not suggest that the trial results would have been seriously compromised. We would recommend the exit interview as a valuable way of assessing adherence to trial procedures.

Indexed as

AdherenceCotrimoxazole prophylaxisExit interview

Identifiers

PMID27536738
PMCPMC4918030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.