Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536722›Full record

ArticlePedagogy in health promotion2015

Experiential Learning Through Participatory Action Research in Public Health Supports Community-Based Training of Future Health Professionals.

Lisa K Marriott, Adam C Lipus, Laurie Choate, Jamie Smith, Leigh Coppola, William E Cameron, Jackilen Shannon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pedagogy in health promotion, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa K MarriottOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Adam C LipusEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Laurie ChoateSouth Puget Sound Community College, Olympia, WA, USA.
Jamie SmithMid-Columbia Medical Center, The Dalles, OR, USA.
Leigh CoppolaOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
William E CameronOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Jackilen ShannonOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

OREGON CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024140 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ORWOLL, ERIC S. · 2006 to 2011
$61.1M
Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Grace B Gill · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000128 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$28.7M
Teacher Institute for the Experience of ScienceR25RR020443 · NCRR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMERON, WILLIAM E. · 2005 to 2010
$1.6M
CHIDR Chatter: Translating community research data forclassroom useR25OD010496 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MARRIOTT, LISA K · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000128NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCRR NIH HHS R25 RR020443NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024140NIH HHS R25 OD010496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engaging community members in research can help cultivate effective partnerships while providing experiential training and continuing education opportunities. Several studies have involved communities in this way, though many have been small in the scale of community involvement or have included little detail of the institutional review board process by which community members became approved researchers in the study. This article presents findings on an evaluation of the training procedures and experiences of 703 first-time community-based volunteer researchers who were recruited in their communities and trained on-site to enroll research participants, collect data, and provide individualized consultation of results at travelling health education and research fairs. Open-ended registration prompts and postfair surveys assessed volunteers' reasons for participating, comfort with their volunteer experiences, and attitudes toward the biomedical research process. An open-ended survey assessed two key community partners' perspectives about their organizations' involvement with supporting the research throughout the process. Volunteers reported their experience to be a unique training opportunity, citing its ability to help them engage with their community, advance research, and obtain additional experience in their health field of interest, particularly nursing, allied health, and medicine-related careers. Community partners cited that their community's participation as volunteer researchers served as a tool to educate the larger community about research, which enabled other research projects to gain acceptance. Together, these results demonstrate that using volunteer researchers can strengthen community research partnerships while providing valuable training experience in public health research for current and aspiring health personnel.

Indexed as

human subject researchruralschoolvolunteer

Identifiers

PMID27536722
PMCPMC4985246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.