ArticleJournal of drug assessment2013
Bioequivalence study of two subcutaneous formulations of dalteparin: randomized, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, cross-over study in healthy volunteers.
Article in Journal of drug assessment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study assessed relative bioavailability of a new subcutaneous formulation, test (T) (dalteparin sodium 95000 IU/3.8 mL) with the branded product (R) in healthy subjects to meet the regulatory requirements of bioequivalence in the US.
methodsThis was an open label, randomized, single dose, two-sequence, two-period cross-over study under fasting conditions. A total of 88 healthy adult volunteers were randomized to either of the treatment arms (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. Pharmacodynamic surrogates, namely anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity, heparin clotting assay (heptest), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were used as a tool to establish bioequivalence between these two formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 36 h post-dose to characterize the primary pharmacokinetic parameters A max, AUC0- t , and AUC0-∞ for anti-Xa and anti-IIa and heptest; parameters (Δt )max and AU(Δt ) for aPTT.
resultsFor anti-Xa activity, the means (SD) of A max (IU/mL) were 1.34 (0.25) [range = 0.59-2.03] and 1.39 (0.35) [range = 0.65-2.69]; AUC0- t (IU•h/mL) values were 11.4 (2.76) [range = 2.89-19.5] and 12.1 (2.87) [range = 2.52-21.30]; AUC0 - ∞ (IU•h/mL) values were 13.1 (3.59) [range = 3.15-28.2] and 14.5 (4.97) [range = 2.79-36.1] for test and branded formulations, respectively. For anti-IIa activity, the means (SD) of A max (IU/mL) were 0.34 (0.12) [range = 0.14-0.72] and 0.34 (0.13) [range = 0.11-0.84]; AUC0- t (IU•h/mL) values were 2.05 (0.72) [range = 0.61-4.69] and 2.11 (0.76) [range = 0.84-4.80]; AUC0 - ∞ (IU•h/mL) values were 2.47 (0.80) [range = 0.76-6.29] and 2.61 (0.86) [range = 1.31-5.36], for test and branded formulations, respectively. The 90% CI for all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of all the pharmacodynamic surrogates tested met the regulatory bioequivalence criterion of 80.00-125.00%.
conclusionThe test product met the US regulatory criteria of bioequivalence relative to the branded product in this single dose bioequivalence study. Study limitations include open-label single dose design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.