Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536380›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2016

Maternal diet quality and nutrient intake in the gestational period: results from the delta healthy sprouts comparative impact trial.

Lisa M Tussing-Humphreys, Jessica L Thomson, Melissa H Goodman, Sarah Olender

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01746394 (Delta Healthy Sprouts), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01746394 nacompletednot on this map

Delta Healthy Sprouts: A Randomized Trial to Determine the Comparative Efficacy of Two Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs on Maternal Weight Control and Childhood Obesity in the Mississippi Delta

TypeinterventionalSponsorUSDA, Delta Human Nutrition Research ProgramRan2013 to 2016Enrolled82ConditionsObesityArmsParents as Teachers Enhanced, Parents as Teachers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Food Environment in the Lower Mississippi Delta: Food Deserts, Food Swamps and Hot Spots.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa M Tussing-HumphreysDepartment of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 W Roosevelt Road, #416, Chicago, IL 60618 USA.
Jessica L ThomsonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA.
Melissa H GoodmanUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 141 Experiment Station Road, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA.
Sarah OlenderDepartment of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1747 W Roosevelt Road, #416, Chicago, IL 60618 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA woman's diet while pregnant can play an important role in her reproductive health as well as the health of her unborn child. Diet quality and nutrient intake amongst pregnant women residing in the rural Lower Mississippi Delta (LMD) region of the United States is inadequate. The Delta Healthy Sprouts Project was designed to test the comparative impact of two home visiting programs on weight status, dietary intake, and health behaviors of women and their infants residing in the LMD region. This paper reports results pertaining to maternal diet quality and nutrient intake in the gestational period.

methodsThe experimental arm (PATE) received monthly home visits beginning in the second trimester using the Parents as Teachers curriculum enhanced with a nutrition and lifestyle behavior curriculum. The control arm (PAT) received monthly home visits using the Parents as Teachers curriculum only. Maternal diet was assessed via 24-h dietary recall at gestational months (GM) 4 (baseline), 6, and 8. Diet quality was computed using the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010).

resultsGestational period retention rates for PAT and PATE arms were 77 % (33/43) and 67 % (26/39), respectively. Significant effects were not found for time, treatment, or time by treatment for the HEI-2010 total or component scores, macro- or micronutrient intake or percentage of women meeting recommended nutrient intakes.

conclusionsPerhaps due to low participant enrollment and higher than expected rates of drop out and noncompliance, we were not able to demonstrate that the enhanced nutrition and lifestyle curriculum (PATE) intervention had a significant effect on diet quality or nutrient intake during pregnancy in this cohort of rural, Southern, primarily African American women.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT01746394. Registered 5 December 2012.

Indexed as

African American womenMaternal diet qualityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27536380
PMCPMC4988030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.