Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536258›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016

Cognitive and Affective Aspects of Creative Option Generation in Everyday Life Situations.

T Sophie Schweizer, Katja M Schmalenberger, Tory A Eisenlohr-Moul, Andreas Mojzisch, Stefan Kaiser, Joachim Funke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T Sophie SchweizerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja M SchmalenbergerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.
Tory A Eisenlohr-MoulDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill NC, USA.
Andreas MojzischInstitute of Psychology, Department of Educational and Social Sciences, University of Hildesheim Hildesheim, Germany.
Stefan KaiserDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Joachim FunkeInstitute of Psychology, University of Heidelberg Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Reproductive Mood DisordersT32MH093315 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN Scott GIRDLER, David R. Rubinow · 2012 to 2026
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Which factors influence a human being's ability to develop new perspectives and be creative? This ability is pivotal for any context in which new cognitions are required, such as innovative endeavors in science and art, or psychotherapeutic settings. In this article, we seek to bring together two research programs investigating the generation of creative options: On the one hand, research on option generation in the decision-making literature and, on the other hand, cognitive and clinical creativity research. Previous decision-making research has largely neglected the topic of generating creative options. Experiments typically provided participants with a clear set of options to choose from, but everyday life situations are less structured and allow countless ways to react. Before choosing an option, agents have to self-generate a set of options to choose from. Such option generation processes have only recently moved to the center of attention. The present study examines the creative quality of self-generated options in daily life situations. A student sample (N = 48) generated options for action in 70 briefly described everyday life scenarios. We rated the quality of the options on three dimensions of creativity- originality, feasibility, and divergence -and linked these qualities to option generation fluency (speed and number of generated options), situational features like the familiarity and the affective valence of the situation in which the options were generated, and trait measures of cognitive performance. We found that when situations were familiar to the participant, greater negative affective valence of the situation was associated with more originality and divergence of generated options. We also found that a higher option generation fluency was associated with a greater maximal originality of options. We complete our article with a joint research agenda for researchers in the decision-making field focusing on option generation and, on the other hand, researchers working on the cognitive and clinical aspects of creativity.

Indexed as

affectcreative cognitioncreativitydecision-makinglong-term memoryoption generationpsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID27536258
PMCPMC4971016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.