Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536226›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity.

Sharon S Simon, Erich S Tusch, Phillip J Holcomb, Kirk R Daffner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05128396 (Successful Aging and Enrichment), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05128396 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Successful Aging and Enrichment (SAGE): Effects of Environmental Stimulation on Cognitive Health and Neuroplasticity

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2013 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsCognitive Health, Healthy AgingArmsCognitive Stimulation, Mindfulness training, Physical Activity, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Verbal working memory modulates afferent circuits in motor cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sharon S SimonDivision of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Center for Brain/Mind Medicine - Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, BostonMA, USA; Old Age Research Group (PROTER), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of MedicineSão Paulo, Brazil.
Erich S TuschDivision of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Center for Brain/Mind Medicine - Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Phillip J HolcombDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford MA, USA.
Kirk R DaffnerDivision of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Center for Brain/Mind Medicine - Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.

Funding

ERP Investigations of Novelty Processing in Different Patterns of Cognitive AgingR01AG017935 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAFFNER, KIRK R · 2002 to 2012
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classic account of the load theory (LT) of attention suggests that increasing cognitive load leads to greater processing of task-irrelevant stimuli due to competition for limited executive resource that reduces the ability to actively maintain current processing priorities. Studies testing this hypothesis have yielded widely divergent outcomes. The inconsistent results may, in part, be related to variability in executive capacity (EC) and task difficulty across subjects in different studies. Here, we used a cross-modal paradigm to investigate whether augmented working memory (WM) load leads to increased early distracter processing, and controlled for the potential confounders of EC and task difficulty. Twenty-three young subjects were engaged in a primary visual WM task, under high and low load conditions, while instructed to ignore irrelevant auditory stimuli. Demands of the high load condition were individually titrated to make task difficulty comparable across subjects with differing EC. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to measure neural activity in response to stimuli presented in both the task relevant modality (visual) and task-irrelevant modality (auditory). Behavioral results indicate that the load manipulation and titration procedure of the primary visual task were successful. ERPs demonstrated that in response to visual target stimuli, there was a load-related increase in the posterior slow wave, an index of sustained attention and effort. Importantly, under high load, there was a decrease of the auditory N1 in response to distracters, a marker of early auditory processing. These results suggest that increased WM load is associated with enhanced attentional engagement and protection from distraction in a cross-modal setting, even after controlling for task difficulty and EC. Our findings challenge the classic LT and offer support for alternative models.

Indexed as

ERPsexecutive capacityload theoryselective attentionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID27536226
PMCPMC4971070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.