Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27536103›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2016

Safety profile of solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with rosmarinic acid for oral use: in vitro and animal approaches.

Ana Raquel Madureira, Sara Nunes, Débora A Campos, João C Fernandes, Cláudia Marques, Monica Zuzarte, Beatriz Gullón, Luís M Rodríguez-Alcalá, Conceição Calhau, Bruno Sarmento and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Polyphenols in Metabolic Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Role ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article
  10. Intake of nanoparticles and impact on gut microbiota:Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Raquel MadureiraCatholic University of Portugal, CBQF - Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - Associate Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology, Porto, Portugal.
Sara NunesLaboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences (IBILI), Faculty of Medicine, and CNC.IBILI Consortium, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Débora A CamposCatholic University of Portugal, CBQF - Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - Associate Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology, Porto, Portugal.
João C FernandesLaboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences (IBILI), Faculty of Medicine, and CNC.IBILI Consortium, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cláudia MarquesDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Monica ZuzarteLaboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences (IBILI), Faculty of Medicine, and CNC.IBILI Consortium, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Beatriz GullónCatholic University of Portugal, CBQF - Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - Associate Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology, Porto, Portugal.
Luís M Rodríguez-AlcaláCatholic University of Portugal, CBQF - Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - Associate Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology, Porto, Portugal.
Conceição CalhauDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal.
Bruno SarmentoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences-North, CESPU, Gandra, Portugal; "I3S" Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; INEB, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Maria GomesCatholic University of Portugal, CBQF - Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - Associate Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Manuela PintadoCatholic University of Portugal, CBQF - Center for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - Associate Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology, Porto, Portugal.
Flávio ReisLaboratory of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences (IBILI), Faculty of Medicine, and CNC.IBILI Consortium, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa · PTAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rosmarinic acid (RA) possesses several protective bioactivities that have attracted increasing interest by nutraceutical/pharmaceutical industries. Considering the reduced bioavailability after oral use, effective (and safe) delivery systems are crucial to protect RA from gastrointestinal degradation. This study aims to characterize the safety profile of solid lipid nanoparticles produced with Witepsol and Carnauba waxes and loaded with RA, using in vitro and in vivo approaches, focused on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity assays, redox status markers, hematological and biochemical profile, liver and kidney function, gut bacterial microbiota, and fecal fatty acids composition. Free RA and sage extract, empty nanoparticles, or nanoparticles loaded with RA or sage extract (0.15 and 1.5 mg/mL) were evaluated for cell (lymphocytes) viability, necrosis and apoptosis, and antioxidant/prooxidant effects upon DNA. Wistar rats were orally treated for 14 days with vehicle (control) and with Witepsol or Carnauba nanoparticles loaded with RA at 1 and 10 mg/kg body weight/d. Blood, urine, feces, and several tissues were collected for analysis. Free and loaded RA, at 0.15 mg/mL, presented a safe profile, while genotoxic potential was found for the higher dose (1.5 mg/mL), mainly by necrosis. Our data suggest that both types of nanoparticles are safe when loaded with moderate concentrations of RA, without in vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity and with an in vivo safety profile in rats orally treated, thus opening new avenues for use in nutraceutical applications.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsCell SurvivalCinnamatesCytokinesisDepsidesDNAGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLipidsLymphocytesMaleNanoparticlesOxidation-ReductionRats, WistarReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRosmarinic Acidcarnauba waxCinnamatesDepsidesDNALipidsRosmarinic AcidTriglyceridesWaxeswitepsolin vitro and animal toxicityrosmarinic acidsafety profilesolid lipid nanoparticlesWitepsol and Carnauba waxes

Identifiers

PMID27536103
PMCPMC4977102
OpenAlexW2488730196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.