Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535993›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2017

A generalized stoichiometric model of C3, C2, C2+C4, and C4 photosynthetic metabolism.

Chandra Bellasio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CBiology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reduction of bundle sheath size boosts cyclic electron flow in CThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. On the road to CThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  11. A generalised dynamic model of leaf-level CPhotosynthesis research · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The energy budget in CThe New phytologist · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. C4 photosynthesis: 50 years of discovery and innovation.Journal of experimental botany · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chandra BellasioDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK c.bellasio@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-7521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of suppressing photorespiration in crops to maximize assimilation and yield is stimulating considerable interest among researchers looking to bioengineer carbon-concentrating mechanisms into C

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, ChemicalPhotosynthesisComputer SimulationAssimilationbioengineeringcarbon-concentrating mechanismconstraintdark reactionsflux balanceflux-balance analysisNAD-MENADP-MEPEPCK.

Identifiers

PMID27535993
PMCPMC5853385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.