Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535938›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Extensive sequence divergence between the reference genomes of two elite indica rice varieties Zhenshan 97 and Minghui 63.

Jianwei Zhang, Ling-Ling Chen, Feng Xing, David A Kudrna, Wen Yao, Dario Copetti, Ting Mu, Weiming Li, Jia-Ming Song, Weibo Xie and 27 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Whole Genome Sequencing of the Moruga Hill Rice (Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Jianwei ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; Arizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Ling-Ling ChenNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Feng XingNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
David A KudrnaArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Wen YaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Dario CopettiArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; International Rice Research Institute, Genetic Resource Center, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Ting MuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Weiming LiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Jia-Ming SongNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Weibo XieNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;ORCID 0000-0002-2768-3572
Seunghee LeeArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Jayson TalagArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Lin ShaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Yue AnNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Chun-Liu ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Yidan OuyangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Shuai SunNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Wen-Biao JiaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Fang LvNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Bogu DuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Meizhong LuoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Carlos Ernesto MaldonadoArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Jose Luis GoicoecheaArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Lizhong XiongNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Changyin WuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Yongzhong XingNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Dao-Xiu ZhouNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Sibin YuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Yu ZhaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Gongwei WangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Yeisoo YuArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Yijie LuoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Zhi-Wei ZhouNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
Beatriz Elena Padilla HurtadoArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Ann DanowitzArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
Rod A WingArizona Genomics Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; BIO5 Institute, School of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; International Rice Research Institute, Genetic Resource Center, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines qifazh@mail.hzau.edu.cn rwing@mail.arizona.edu.
Qifa ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; qifazh@mail.hzau.edu.cn rwing@mail.arizona.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asian cultivated rice consists of two subspecies: Oryza sativa subsp. indica and O. sativa subsp. japonica Despite the fact that indica rice accounts for over 70% of total rice production worldwide and is genetically much more diverse, a high-quality reference genome for indica rice has yet to be published. We conducted map-based sequencing of two indica rice lines, Zhenshan 97 (ZS97) and Minghui 63 (MH63), which represent the two major varietal groups of the indica subspecies and are the parents of an elite Chinese hybrid. The genome sequences were assembled into 237 (ZS97) and 181 (MH63) contigs, with an accuracy >99.99%, and covered 90.6% and 93.2% of their estimated genome sizes. Comparative analyses of these two indica genomes uncovered surprising structural differences, especially with respect to inversions, translocations, presence/absence variations, and segmental duplications. Approximately 42% of nontransposable element related genes were identical between the two genomes. Transcriptome analysis of three tissues showed that 1,059-2,217 more genes were expressed in the hybrid than in the parents and that the expressed genes in the hybrid were much more diverse due to their divergence between the parental genomes. The public availability of two high-quality reference genomes for the indica subspecies of rice will have large-ranging implications for plant biology and crop genetic improvement.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, PlantINDEL MutationOryzaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSpecies SpecificityBAC-by-BAC strategyOryza sativareference genomestranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27535938
PMCPMC5024649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.