Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535830›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2016

Recovery-based staff training intervention within mental health rehabilitation units: a two-stage analysis using realistic evaluation principles and framework approach.

Sadiq Bhanbhro, Melanie Gee, Sarah Cook, Louise Marston, Melanie Lean, Helen Killaspy

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sadiq BhanbhroCentre for Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK. s.bhanbhro@shu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0771-8130
Melanie GeeCentre for Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Sarah CookCentre for Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Louise MarstonDepartments of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Melanie LeanDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Helen KillaspyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0610-10097Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term change in recovery-based practice in mental health rehabilitation is a research priority.

methodsWe used a qualitative case study analysis using a blend of traditional 'framework' analysis and 'realist' approaches to carry out an evaluation of a recovery-focused staff training intervention within three purposively selected mental health rehabilitation units. We maximised the validity of the data by triangulating multiple data sources.

resultsWe found that organisational culture and embedding of a change management programme in routine practice were reported as key influences in sustaining change in practice. The qualitative study generated 10 recommendations on how to achieve long-term change in practice including addressing pre-existing organisational issues and synergising concurrent change programmes.

conclusionsWe propose that a recovery-focused staff training intervention requires clear leadership and integration with any existing change management programmes to facilitate sustained improvements in routine practice.

Indexed as

Organizational CultureOrganizational InnovationHealth PersonnelHumansPsychiatric RehabilitationQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27535830
PMCPMC4989510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.