Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535789›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

pH drop impacts differentially skin and gut microbiota of the Amazonian fish tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum).

François-Étienne Sylvain, Bachar Cheaib, Martin Llewellyn, Tiago Gabriel Correia, Daniel Barros Fagundes, Adalberto Luis Val, Nicolas Derome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Climate-mediated food safety hazards of aquaculture.Environmental research. Food systems · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Impacts of Black Soldier Fly (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

François-Étienne SylvainInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Bachar CheaibInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Martin LlewellynInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Tiago Gabriel CorreiaFederal University of Amapá (UNIFAP), AP 68.903-419, Brazil.
Daniel Barros FagundesInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Ecofisiologia e Evolução Molecular, Manaus, AM, 69067-375, Brazil.
Adalberto Luis ValInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Ecofisiologia e Evolução Molecular, Manaus, AM, 69067-375, Brazil.
Nicolas DeromeInstitut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes (IBIS), Département de Biologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic organisms are increasingly exposed to lowering of environmental pH due to anthropogenic pressure (e.g. acid rain, acid mine drainages). Such acute variations trigger imbalance of fish-associated microbiota, which in turn favour opportunistic diseases. We used the tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum), an Amazonian fish tolerant to significant pH variation in its natural environment, to assess the response of fish endogenous microbiota to acute short-term acid stress. We exposed 36 specimens of tambaquis to acidic water (pH 4.0) over 2 consecutive weeks and sampled cutaneous mucus, feces and water at 0, 7 &14 days. The 16S RNA hypervariable region V4 was sequenced on Illumina MiSeq. After two weeks of acidic exposure, fecal and skin microbiota taxonomic structures exhibited different patterns: skin microbiota was still exhibiting a significantly disturbed composition whereas fecal microbiota recovered a similar composition to control group, thus suggesting a stronger resilience capacity of the intestinal microbiota than cutaneous microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBetaproteobacteriaCharaciformesGillsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, RNASkinRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27535789
PMCPMC4989189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.