Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535682›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

The Confounding Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Understanding the Impact of Technology on Patient Care.

Christopher D Doern

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Detection of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Adoption of new technologies in laboratory workflow practices for positive blood culture bottles: a cross-sectional survey among hospitals in the Autonomous Community of Valencia, Spain.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship and rapid microarray testing on patients with Gram-negative bacteremia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher D DoernVirginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, USA Christopher.doern@vcuhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2454-4355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefit of the combination of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention and rapid diagnostic testing (RDT). However, few studies have attempted to study the incremental benefit of ASP and RDT, making it difficult to understand the true benefits of each intervention. This issue is discussed in the context of an article by S. H. McVane and F. S. Nolte (J Clin Microbiol 54:2476-2484, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1128/JCM.00996-16), with suggestions about how the findings of this study can be applied to other areas of clinical microbiology.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsPatient CareHumansAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID27535682
PMCPMC5035404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.