Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535457›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2016

Operating Room-to-ICU Patient Handovers: A Multidisciplinary Human-Centered Design Approach.

Noa Segall, Alberto S Bonifacio, Atilio Barbeito, Rebecca A Schroeder, Sharon R Perfect, Melanie C Wright, James D Emery, B Zane Atkins, Jeffrey M Taekman, Jonathan B Mark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigating Why Clinicians Deviate from Standards of Care: Liberating Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Importance of high-performing teams in the cardiovascular intensive care unit.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Motivations Influencing the Surgeon's Healthcare Unit Choice to Perform Surgery: A Confirmatory Study in Portugal.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of patient handover structure on neonatal perioperative safety.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Observational
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noa SegallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center (DUMC), Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alberto S Bonifacio
Atilio Barbeito
Rebecca A Schroeder
Sharon R Perfect
Melanie C Wright
James D Emery
B Zane Atkins
Jeffrey M Taekman
Jonathan B Mark

Funding

Information Management in the Perioperative EnvironmentK02HS015704 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, MELANIE C · 2006 to 2010
$479k
AHRQ HHS K02 HS015704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient handovers (handoffs) following surgery have often been characterized by poor teamwork, unclear procedures, unstructured processes, and distractions. A study was conducted to apply a human-centered approach to the redesign of operating room (OR)-to-ICU patient handovers in a broad surgical ICU (SICU) population. This approach entailed (1) the study of existing practices, (2) the redesign of the handover on the basis of the input of hand over participants and evidence in the medical literature, and (3) the study of the effects of this change on processes and communication.

methodsThe Durham [North Carolina] Veterans Affairs Medical Center SICU is an 11-bed mixed surgical specialty unit. To understand the existing process for receiving postoperative patients in the SICU, ethnographic methods-a series of observations, surveys, interviews, and focus groups-were used. The handover process was redesigned to better address providers' work flow, information needs, and expectations, as well as concerns identified in the literature.

resultsTechnical and communication flaws were uncovered, and the handover was redesigned to address them. For the 49 preintervention and 49 postintervention handovers, the information transfer score and number of interruptions were not significantly different. However, staff workload and team behaviors scores improved significantly, while the hand over duration was not prolonged by the new process. Handover participants were also significantly more satisfied with the new handover method.

conclusionsAn HCD approach led to improvements in the patient handover process from the OR to the ICU in a mixed adult surgical population. Although the specific handover process would unlikely be optimal in another clinical setting if replicated exactly, the HCD foundation behind the redesign process is widely applicable.

Indexed as

Hospitals, VeteransIntensive Care UnitsOperating RoomsAnthropology, CulturalHumansModels, OrganizationalNorth CarolinaPatient Handoff

Identifiers

PMID27535457
PMCPMC6152817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.