Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27535378›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Coordinating long-latency stretch responses across the shoulder, elbow, and wrist during goal-directed reaching.

Jeffrey Weiler, James Saravanamuttu, Paul L Gribble, J Andrew Pruszynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proprioceptive and Visual Feedback Responses in Macaques Exploit Goal Redundancy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Feedforward and Feedback Control Share an Internal Model of the Arm's Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey WeilerBrain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; jeffweilerphd@gmail.com.
James SaravanamuttuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Paul L GribbleBrain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Andrew PruszynskiBrain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Training-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor and Sensory SystemsR01HD075740 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI OSTRY, DAVID J · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-latency stretch response (muscle activity 50-100 ms after a mechanical perturbation) can be coordinated across multiple joints to support goal-directed actions. Here we assessed the flexibility of such coordination and whether it serves to counteract intersegmental dynamics and exploit kinematic redundancy. In three experiments, participants made planar reaches to visual targets after elbow perturbations and we assessed the coordination of long-latency stretch responses across shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles. Importantly, targets were placed such that elbow and wrist (but not shoulder) rotations could help transport the hand to the target-a simple form of kinematic redundancy. In experiment 1 we applied perturbations of different magnitudes to the elbow and found that long-latency stretch responses in shoulder, elbow, and wrist muscles scaled with perturbation magnitude. In experiment 2 we examined the trial-by-trial relationship between long-latency stretch responses at adjacent joints and found that the magnitudes of the responses in shoulder and elbow muscles, as well as elbow and wrist muscles, were positively correlated. In experiment 3 we explicitly instructed participants how to use their wrist to move their hand to the target after the perturbation. We found that long-latency stretch responses in wrist muscles were not sensitive to our instructions, despite the fact that participants incorporated these instructions into their voluntary behavior. Taken together, our results indicate that, during reaching, the coordination of long-latency stretch responses across multiple joints counteracts intersegmental dynamics but may not be able to exploit kinematic redundancy.

Indexed as

GoalsElbowElectromyographyExoskeleton DeviceFemaleHumansMaleMovementMuscle, SkeletalReaction TimeReflex, StretchShoulderTime FactorsWristYoung AdultcoordinationEMGfeedbackgoal-dependent activityintersegmental dynamicslong-latency stretch responsemovementreflexupper limb

Identifiers

PMID27535378
PMCPMC5102314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.