Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27534980›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2017

Original Research: Evaluation of pulmonary response to inhaled tungsten (IV) oxide nanoparticles in golden Syrian hamsters.

Milankumar V Prajapati, Olujoba O Adebolu, Benjamin M Morrow, Joseph M Cerreta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pulmonary injury following exposure to amorphous silicon dioxide nanoparticles inExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tungsten toxicity and carcinogenesis.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inhalation of Tungsten Metal Particulates Alters the Lung and Bone Microenvironments Following Acute Exposure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Milankumar V PrajapatiCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA.
Olujoba O AdeboluCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA.
Benjamin M MorrowMaterials Science & Technology, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Joseph M CerretaCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY 11439, USA cerretaj@stjohns.edu.
St. John's University · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive industrial and military uses of tungsten have raised the possibilities of human occupational and environmental exposure to nanoparticles of this metal, with concomitant health concerns. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential mechanism of pulmonary toxicity associated with inhaled tungsten (IV) oxide nanoparticles (WO

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDose-Response Relationship, DrugHMGB1 ProteinInflammasomesLungMesocricetusMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNanoparticlesOxidesPneumoniaTissue DistributionTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTungstenHMGB1 ProteinInflammasomesOxidesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTungstentungsten oxideinflammasomeinhalationnanoparticlesTungsten oxide

Identifiers

PMID27534980
PMCPMC5206983
OpenAlexW2507412718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.