ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2016
Comparison of distributed and compartmental models of drug disposition: assessment of tissue uptake kinetics.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Minimal PKPD Interaction Model for Evaluating Synergy Effects of Combined NSCLC Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of a circulatory three-compartment model for the assessment of tissue uptake kinetics is tested by comparison with the respective distributed models using pharmacokinetic data of rocuronium in patients These minimal physiologically based models have a common structure consisting of two subsystems representing the lung and the lumped systemic circulation, with two regions, the vascular and tissue space. The distributed models are based on either diffusion-limited tissue distribution, permeability-limited tissue uptake or the assumption of an empirical transit time density function. With a deviation in the estimate of the permeability-surface area product (PS) of about 18 %, the compartmental approach appears as a useful alternative on condition that a priori knowledge of cardiac output is included. It is also shown that the distribution clearance calculated from the parameters of a mammillary compartment model changes proportional to PS and can be used as an indirect measure of permeability-limited tissue uptake of drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.