Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27534937›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2016

Long-term exposure to commercially available sunscreens containing nanoparticles of TiO2 and ZnO revealed no biological impact in a hairless mouse model.

Megan J Osmond-McLeod, Yalchin Oytam, Anthony Rowe, Fariborz Sobhanmanesh, Gavin Greenoak, Jason Kirby, Elizabeth F McInnes, Maxine J McCall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A New Look at the Effects of Engineered ZnO and TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Megan J Osmond-McLeodCSIRO Advanced Materials TCP (Nanosafety), Manufacturing Flagship, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia. megan.osmond@csiro.au.
Yalchin OytamCSIRO Advanced Materials TCP (Nanosafety), Manufacturing Flagship, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Anthony RoweCSIRO, Food & Nutrition Flagship, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Fariborz SobhanmaneshCSIRO, Food & Nutrition Flagship, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Gavin GreenoakAustralian Photobiology Testing Facility, Forest Lodge, NSW, 2037, Australia.
Jason KirbyCSIRO Advanced Materials TCP (Nanosafety), Manufacturing Flagship, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Elizabeth F McInnesGribbles Veterinary Pathology Australia, Glenside, SA, 5065, Australia.
Maxine J McCallCSIRO Advanced Materials TCP (Nanosafety), Manufacturing Flagship, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUAustralian Genome Research Facility · AUCSIRO Land and Water · AUSouth Australia Pathology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of sunscreen is a critical component of a sun-safe strategy, however the possibility of unexpected, adverse outcomes resulting from long-term use of sunscreens containing nanoparticles of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) has not yet been examined. Here, immune-competent hairless mice were exposed over a 36-week period to weekly topical applications of sunscreens containing nanoparticles of ZnO or TiO2, or no metal oxide nanoparticles, with or without subsequent exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Control groups received no sunscreen applications, with or without UVR.

resultsMice exposed to UVR in the absence of sunscreen developed statistically significant incidences of histologically-diagnosed malignant and benign skin neoplasms, whereas no statistically significant adverse biological outcomes were found in mice treated with the sunscreens containing ZnO or TiO2 nanoparticles. Elevated levels of Ti were detected in the livers of mice treated with sunscreen containing TiO2 nanoparticles compared to untreated control, but total Zn concentrations did not significantly alter in any major organs except for the skin of mice treated with ZnO sunscreen. Exposure to UVR did not have a significant impact on examined tissue concentrations of Zn or Ti. Few to no transcriptional changes were found in ZnO or TiO2-treated groups, but mice treated with the sunscreen containing only organic filters showed substantial gene disregulation.

conclusionsTaken together with previous work, this long-term study provided no basis to avoid the use of sunscreens containing metal oxide nanoparticles.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingLiverMetal NanoparticlesMiceMice, HairlessSunscreening AgentsTissue DistributionTitaniumUltraviolet RaysZinc OxideSunscreening AgentsTitaniumtitanium dioxideZinc OxideLong-termNanoparticlesOrganic UV filterSunscreenUltraviolet radiation

Identifiers

PMID27534937
PMCPMC4989375
OpenAlexW2516657937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.