ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2016
Optimal slopes and speeds in uphill ski mountaineering: a field study.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of uphill training on the maximal velocity and performance of middle-distance runners: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Olympic Snow Sports: Current Insights and Future Directions for Milano Cortina 2026 and Beyond.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Review
- Biomechanical comparison of pin and freeride ski mountaineering bindings in recreational skiers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Article
- Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the physiology of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Exceptional Performance in Competitive Ski Mountaineering: An Inertial Sensor Case Study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Heel riser height and slope gradient influence the kinematics and kinetics of ski mountaineering-A laboratory study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Assessment of Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Ski Mountaineering: A Laboratory-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Steeper or Faster? Tactical Dispositions to Minimize Oxygen Cost in Ski Mountaineering.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Ski Mountaineering: Perspectives on a Novel Sport to Be Introduced at the 2026 Winter Olympic Games.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- In-Field Validation of an Inertial Sensor-Based System for Movement Analysis and Classification in Ski Mountaineering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Effects of Recreational Ski Mountaineering on Cumulative Muscle Fatigue - A Longitudinal Trial.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to describe the effects of speed and gradient during uphill ski mountaineering on energy expenditure, to relate any changes to changes in stride characteristics, and to determine an optimal gradient and speed allowing minimization of energy expenditure.
methods11 subjects were tested on snowy trails using their mountaineering skis (fitted with skins), boots and poles, at three gradients (7, 11 and 33 %) at 80 % of maximum heart rate (HRmax), and at 11 % also at 90 and 100 % of HRmax. Energy expenditure was calculated by indirect calorimetry to derive energy cost of locomotion (EC), vertical energy cost (ECvert) and mechanical efficiency, while stride length, stride frequency, relative and absolute thrust phase duration, and slope gradient were measured with an inertial sensor-based system.
resultsAt 11 % there was no change with speed in EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency, while stride length and frequency increased and absolute thrust phase duration decreased. There was an effect of gradient on EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency, while speed, stride length and stride frequency decreased and absolute and relative thrust phase duration increased. The most economical gradient (lowest ECvert) was the steepest one.
conclusionDuring ski mountaineering uphill at shallow gradient (11 %), EC, ECvert and mechanical efficiency do not vary with speed, while at steeper gradient (33 %) economy is improved. It follows that to minimize energy expenditure and optimize performance to reach a place located at a higher altitude, an athlete should choose a steep gradient, if he/she is able to maintain a sufficient speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27534770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.