Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27534631›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Assessing infant cognitive development after prenatal iodine supplementation.

Martha Ann Bell, Alleyne P Ross, Gay Goodman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Iodine Supplementation Before, During and After Pregnancy.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nutrition and Brain Development.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martha Ann BellDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; and mabell@vt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-0374
Alleyne P RossDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA; and.
Gay GoodmanHuman Health Risk Research, Seattle, WA.

Funding

Psychobiology of Cognitive DevelopmentR01HD049878 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2007 to 2017
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little information is available on infant behavioral development outcomes of prenatal iodine supplementation in regions of mild to moderate iodine deficiency. Studies performed to date, all of which relied on global developmental assessments, have yielded inconsistent findings with regard to psychomotor development, negative findings with regard to mental development, and no information as to the development of specific cognitive functions. Our review of these studies leads us to suspect that the use of global developmental assessments might partially explain the negative and inconsistent findings. To identify cognitive processes that might be sensitive to prenatal iodine supplementation, we examined the timing of thyroid hormone action on specific brain systems. The development of infant visual attention is sensitive to thyroid hormone during the early prenatal period, when the fetus is entirely dependent on maternal thyroid hormone. For this reason, infant visual attention has the potential to be a sensitive measure of infant outcomes in prenatal iodine supplementation studies. We suggest the assessment of infant visual attention, with follow-up examination of childhood executive functions, as a means of capturing the effects of maternal iodine deficiency and prenatal iodine supplementation on specific cognitive processes. In particular, we propose comparison of infant performance on global developmental tests and specialized tests of visual attention in pilot trials of prenatal iodine supplementation in regions of mild to moderate iodine deficiency. Only by comparing the 2 types of tests side by side will it be possible to establish whether the use of a sensitive measure of infant visual attention will increase the reliability of such supplementation studies. Recognizing that exposure misclassification may also provide a partial explanation for the inconsistent neurodevelopmental outcomes in previous studies, we suggest that urinary iodine concentration or creatinine-corrected iodine excretion be monitored regularly in such trials throughout the prenatal period.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAttentionBrainChild DevelopmentCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIodineMalePregnancyPrenatal CareIodineThyroid HormonesTrace ElementsBayley scalesbrain systemscognitive behaviorsinfant neurodevelopmentprenatal nutrition

Identifiers

PMID27534631
PMCPMC5004494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.