Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27534630›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Comparison of 2 methods for estimating the prevalences of inadequate and excessive iodine intakes.

WenYen Juan, Paula R Trumbo, Judith H Spungen, Johanna T Dwyer, Alicia L Carriquiry, Thea P Zimmerman, Christine A Swanson, Suzanne P Murphy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence of iodine deficiency among Moroccan women of reproductive age.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Iodine in food- and dietary supplement-composition databases.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

WenYen JuanCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD; wenyen.juan@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1658-2848
Paula R TrumboCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD;
Judith H SpungenCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD;
Johanna T DwyerOffice of Dietary Supplements, NIH, Bethesda, MD;
Alicia L CarriquiryDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA;
Thea P ZimmermanWestat, Rockville, MD; and.
Christine A SwansonOffice of Dietary Supplements, NIH, Bethesda, MD;
Suzanne P MurphyUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI.
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USOffice of Dietary Supplements · USIowa State University · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USWestat (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevalences of iodine inadequacy and excess are usually evaluated by comparing the population distribution of urinary iodine concentration (UIC) in spot samples with established UIC cutoffs. To our knowledge, until now, dietary intake data have not been assessed for this purpose.

objectiveOur objective was to compare 2 methods for evaluating the prevalence of iodine inadequacy and excess in sex- and life stage-specific subgroups of the US population: one that uses UIC cutoffs, and one that uses iodine intake cutoffs.

designBy using the iodine concentrations of foods measured in the US Food and Drug Administration's Total Diet Study (TDS), dietary intake data from the NHANES 2003-2010, and a file that maps each NHANES food to a TDS food with similar ingredients, we estimated each NHANES participant's iodine intake from each NHANES food as the mean iodine concentration of the corresponding TDS food in samples gathered over the same 2-y period. We calculated prevalences of iodine inadequacy and excess in each sex- and life stage-specific subgroup by both the UIC cutoff method and the iodine intake cutoff method-using the UIC values and dietary intakes reported for NHANES participants who provided both types of data-and compared the prevalences across methods.

resultsWe found lower prevalences of iodine inadequacy across all sex- and life stage-specific subgroups with the iodine intake cutoff method than with the UIC cutoff method; for pregnant females, the respective prevalences were 5.0% and 37.9%. For children aged ≤8 y, the prevalence of excessive iodine intake was high by either method.

conclusionsThe consideration of dietary iodine intake from all sources may provide a more complete understanding of population prevalences of iodine inadequacy and excess and thus better inform dietary guidance than consideration of UIC alone. Methods of adjusting UIC for within-person variation are needed to improve the accuracy of prevalence assessments based on UIC.

Indexed as

DietNutrition AssessmentAdolescentAdultBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolDiet SurveysFemaleHumansInfantIodineMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysOvernutritionBiomarkersIodinedietary surveysfood contentiodineTotal Diet Studyurinary iodinevariability

Identifiers

PMID27534630
PMCPMC5004496
OpenAlexW2509846285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.