ArticleIrish journal of medical science2017
A retrospective cohort analysis of hypoglycaemic and cardiovascular agent use in young adults in the Irish primary care setting.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe prevalence of type 2 diabetes in young adults is increasing, yet little is known about medication use in this population. This study aimed to describe hypoglycaemic and cardiovascular treatment patterns in young adults newly treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents.
methodsA retrospective cohort study from 2008-2011 was conducted using the Irish national pharmacy claims database. Subjects aged 15-39 years were analysed for use of hypoglycaemic therapy, subsequent regimen changes, and any co-prescription of cardiovascular agents 1 year after treatment initiation. Cox-proportional-hazards regression and logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with non-persistence to initial hypoglycaemic therapy (in males only), insulin use as a regimen change, and use of cardiovascular agents. Hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) are presented.
resultsThere were 5284 individuals initiated on hypoglycaemic agents. Most were initiated on metformin (88 %); 13 % of subjects received a hypoglycaemic agent regimen change, with insulin being used in 26 % of these cases. A total of 38 % of males were non-persistent with their initial hypoglycaemic agent, with males aged 15-29 years and those on sulphonylureas significantly more likely to be non-persistent with therapy. Over 40 % of subjects were initiated on cardiovascular agents. Females were less likely to receive cardiovascular agents [OR 0.50 (95 % CI 0.42-0.83)].
conclusionsTreatment patterns were found to be associated with high levels of non-persistence, substantial use of insulin, and a low use of cardiovascular agents. This may pose problems for the management of the long-term complications associated with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.