Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27534428›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS2016

Aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio as a screening test for primary aldosteronism: A meta-analysis.

Xiyue Li, Richa Goswami, Shumin Yang, Qifu Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system : JRAAS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03155139 (Primary Aldosteronism In Hypertensive Patients in China), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03155139 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Primary Aldosteronism In Hypertensive Patients in China

TypeobservationalSponsorQifu LiRan2017 to 2018Enrolled3,500ConditionsHyperaldosteronism, Primary, Hypertension SecondaryArmsAldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) testing, Confirmatory tests
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Primary aldosteronism - a multidimensional syndrome.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiyue LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China.
Richa GoswamiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China.
Shumin YangDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China.
Qifu LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China liqifu@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe accuracy of aldosterone/direct renin concentration ratio (ADRR) as a screening test in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) varies widely across the studies. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of ADRR.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library published between April 1971-February 2016. Studies focusing on the accuracy of ADRR for PA screening were included. Two authors independently extracted information regarding patient characteristics, antihypertensives status, true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. The random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

resultsNine studies involving 974 patients were included. The overall sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio of ADRR were 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.93), 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 0.985 and 324 respectively, with substantial heterogeneity. Meta-regression showed that antihypertensive status affects the ADRR and may account for the heterogeneity (p=0.03). Subgroup analysis of patients who discontinued the antihypertensives revealed a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the efficacy of ADRR as a screening test for PA. However, as antihypertensive drugs can interfere with the interpretation of ADRR, it is recommended to interrupt therapy or at least replace with analogues that do not significantly affect the ADRR value.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAldosteroneAntihypertensive AgentsHumansHyperaldosteronismPublication BiasReninROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAldosteroneAntihypertensive AgentsReninaldosterone/direct renin concentrationaldosterone-to-renin ratiodirect renin concentrationPrimary aldosteronismscreening test

Identifiers

PMID27534428
PMCPMC5843892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.