ReviewPharmacogenomics2016
A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.
Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A United Kingdom nationally representative survey of public attitudes towards pharmacogenomics.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2025Article
- Biobanks in chronic disease management: A comprehensive review of strategies, challenges, and future directions.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Assessment of the current status of real-world pharmacogenomic testing: informed consent, patient education, and related practices.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Mental Health Prescribers' Perceptions on the Use of Pharmacogenetic Testing in the Management of Depression in the Middle East and North Africa Region.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023Article
- How to Implement a Pharmacogenetics Service at your Institution.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022Article
- Experiences and practices of key research team members in obtaining informed consent for pharmacogenetic research among people living with HIV: a qualitative study.Research ethics · 2022Article
- Challenges in cardiovascular pharmacogenomics implementation: a viewpoint from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2022Article
- Revisiting Secondary Information Related to Pharmacogenetic Testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Pharmacogenetics in Practice: Estimating the Clinical Actionability of Pharmacogenetic Testing in Perioperative and Ambulatory Settings.Clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Physicians' Attitudes and Ethical Obligations to Pharmacogenetic Testing.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- A stepwise approach to implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the primary care setting.Pharmacogenomics · 2019Article
- Pharmacogenomic Testing In Pediatrics: Navigating The Ethical, Social, And Legal Challenges.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimWe aimed to understand consent practices for pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing.
methodsWe conducted a literature review and analysis of consent forms from clinical laboratories offering PGx testing.
resultsOur review of the literature shows a lack of consensus about the need for and type of informed consent for PGx testing. We identified 35 companies offering PGx testing and were able to confirm consent practices for 22 of those. We found a range of variability in the consent practices regarding the consent approach and information disclosed.
conclusionVariability in the consent practices among laboratories offering PGx testing mirrors the ambiguous practices and recommendations reported in the literature. Establishing a minimal set of information to be disclosed to patients may help address the disparities in consent practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.