ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2016
Pelvic floor muscle strength in primiparous women according to the delivery type: cross-sectional study.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2020Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Exercise Therapy for Postpartum Urinary Incontinence-Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Nulliparous, Parous and Postmenopausal Women and its Association with Various Factors.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2022Article
- Risk factors of pelvic floor muscle strength in south Chinese women: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- The effect of parity on the function of pelvic floor musculature in the long term: cross-sectional study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto compare the pelvic floor muscle strength in primiparous women after normal birth and cesarean section, related to the socio-demographic characteristics, nutritional status, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, perineal exercise in pregnancy, perineal condition and weight of the newborn.
methodsthis was a cross-sectional study conducted after 50 - 70 postpartum days, with 24 primiparous women who underwent cesarean delivery and 72 who had a normal birth. The 9301 PeritronTM was used for analysis of muscle strength. The mean muscle strength was compared between the groups by two-way analysis of variance.
resultsthe pelvic floor muscle strength was 24.0 cmH2O (±16.2) and 25.4 cmH2O (±14.7) in postpartum primiparous women after normal birth and cesarean section, respectively, with no significant difference. The muscular strength was greater in postpartum women with ≥ 12 years of study (42.0 ±26.3 versus 14.6 ±7.7 cmH2O; p= 0.036) and in those who performed perineal exercises (42.6±25.4 11.8±4.9 vs. cmH2O; p = 0.010), compared to caesarean. There was no difference in muscle strength according to delivery type regarding nutritional status, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, perineal condition or newborn weight.
conclusionpelvic floor muscle strength does not differ between primiparous women based on the type of delivery. Postpartum women with normal births, with higher education who performed perineal exercise during pregnancy showed greater muscle strength. OBJETIVOS: comparar a força muscular do assoalho pélvico em primíparas no pós-parto normal e cesariana, relacionando-a às características sociodemográficas, estado nutricional, incontinência urinária, dispareunia, exercício perineal na gestação, condição perineal e peso do recém-nascido. MÉTODO: estudo transversal realizado entre 50 e 70 dias de pós-parto, com 24 primíparas submetidas à cesariana e 72 ao parto normal. Utilizou-se PeritronTM 9301 para análise da força muscular. Comparou-se as médias da força muscular entre os grupos pela Análise de Variância a dois fatores. RESULTADOS: a força muscular do assoalho pélvico foi de 24,0 cmH2O(±16,2) e 25,4 cmH2O(±14,7) em primíparas pós-parto normal e cesariana, respectivamente, sem diferença significativa. A força muscular foi maior nas mulheres de pós-parto normal com ≥12 anos de estudo (42,0±26,3 versus 14,6±7,7 cmH2O; p=0,036) e que realizaram exercício perineal (42,6±25,4 versus 11,8±4,9 cmH2O; p=0,010), comparadas às de cesariana. Não houve diferença na força muscular segundo o tipo de parto quanto ao estado nutricional, incontinência urinária, dispareunia, condição perineal e peso do recém-nascido. CONCLUSÃO: a força muscular do assoalho pélvico não difere entre primíparas quanto ao tipo de parto. Mulheres pós-parto normal com maior escolaridade e que realizaram exercício perineal na gestação, tem maior força muscular. OBJETIVOS: comparar la fuerza muscular del suelo pélvico en primíparas en el posparto normal y cesárea, relacionándola a las características sociodemográficas, estado nutricional, incontinencia urinaria, coito doloroso, ejercicio perineal en la gestación, condición perineal y peso del recién nacido. MÉTODO: estudio transversal realizado entre 50 y 70 días de posparto, con 24 primíparas sometidas a cesárea y 72 a parto normal. Se utilizó PeritronTM 9301 para analizar la fuerza muscular. Se compararon los promedios de la fuerza muscular entre los grupos por medio del Análisis de Variancia de dos factores. RESULTADOS: la fuerza muscular del suelo pélvico fue de 24,0 cmH2O(±16,2) y 25,4 cmH2O(±14,7) en primíparas posparto normal y cesárea, respectivamente, sin diferencia significativa. La fuerza muscular fue mayor en las mujeres de posparto normal con ≥12 años de estudio (42,0±26,3 versus 14,6±7,7 cmH2O; p=0,036) y que realizaron ejercicio perineal (42,6±25,4 versus 11,8±4,9 cmH2O; p=0,010), comparadas con las de cesárea. No hubo diferencia en la fuerza muscular según el tipo de parto en lo que se refiere al estado nutricional, incontinencia urinaria, coito doloroso, condición perineal y peso del recién nacido. CONCLUSIÓN: la fuerza muscular del suelo pélvico no difiere entre las primíparas en lo que se refiere al tipo de parto. Las mujeres posparto normal con mayor escolaridad y que realizaron ejercicio perineal en la gestación, tienen mayor fuerza muscular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.