Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27532820›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in stem cell biology2016

Comprehensive Protocols for CRISPR/Cas9-based Gene Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

David P Santos, Evangelos Kiskinis, Kevin Eggan, Florian T Merkle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in stem cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Editing the genome of hiPSC with CRISPR/Cas9: disease models.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David P SantosThe Ken & Ruth Davee Department of Neurology & Clinical Neurological Sciences, Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Evangelos KiskinisThe Ken & Ruth Davee Department of Neurology & Clinical Neurological Sciences, Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Kevin EgganDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Florian T MerkleMetabolic Research Laboratories and Medical Research Council Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, and Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Regulatory Roles and Dynamics of Nuclear long-noncoding RNAs in PluripotencyP01GM099117 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI RINN, JOHN LOUIS · 2011 to 2021
$21.2M
Genetics of Sleep in ZebrafishR01HL109525 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIER, ALEXANDER F · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
Cellular models of hypocretin neuron loss in narcolepsyK99NS083713 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MERKLE, FLORIAN TOBIAS · 2013 to 2014
$178k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MR/P501967/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109525NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099117NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS083713Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) with the CRISPR/Cas9 system has the potential to revolutionize hPSC-based disease modeling, drug screening, and transplantation therapy. Here, we aim to provide a single resource to enable groups, even those with limited experience with hPSC culture or the CRISPR/Cas9 system, to successfully perform genome editing. The methods are presented in detail and are supported by a theoretical framework to allow for the incorporation of inevitable improvements in the rapidly evolving gene-editing field. We describe protocols to generate hPSC lines with gene-specific knock-outs, small targeted mutations, or knock-in reporters. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell LineClone CellsCloning, MolecularColony-Forming Units AssayCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNAGene AmplificationGene EditingGene Knockout TechniquesGenes, ReporterGene TargetingGenetic VectorsGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansDNAOligonucleotidesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPRgene editingknock-inpluripotentstem cell

Identifiers

PMID27532820
PMCPMC4988528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.