Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27532609›Full record

ArticleHuman gene therapy. Clinical development2016

Safety Studies in Tumor and Non-Tumor-Bearing Mice in Support of Clinical Trials Using Oncolytic VSV-IFNβ-NIS.

Lianwen Zhang, Michael B Steele, Nathan Jenks, Jacquelyn Grell, Lukkana Suksanpaisan, Shruthi Naik, Mark J Federspiel, Martha Q Lacy, Stephen J Russell, Kah-Whye Peng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human gene therapy. Clinical development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Viral Vector-Based Cancer Vaccines.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lianwen Zhang1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael B Steele1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Nathan Jenks1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Jacquelyn Grell1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Lukkana Suksanpaisan3 Imanis Life Sciences , Rochester, Minnesota.
Shruthi Naik1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark J Federspiel1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Martha Q Lacy5 Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Stephen J Russell1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Kah-Whye Peng1 Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Rafael Fonseca · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Intravenous Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis VectorsR01CA175795 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PENG, KAH-WHYE · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic VSV-IFNβ-NIS is selectively destructive to tumors. Here, we present the IND enabling preclinical rodent studies in support of clinical testing of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) as a systemic therapy. Efficacy studies showed dose-dependent tumor regression in C57BL/KaLwRij mice bearing syngeneic 5TGM1 plasmacytomas after systemic VSV administration. In contrast, the virus was effective at all doses tested against human KAS6/1 xenografts in SCID mice. Intravenous administration of VSV-mIFNβ-NIS is well tolerated in C57BL/6 mice up to 5 × 10(10) TCID50 (50% tissue culture infective dose)/kg with no neurovirulence, no cytokine storm, and no abnormalities in tissues. Dose-limiting toxicities included elevated transaminases, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia. Inactivated viral particles did not cause hepatic toxicity. Intravenously administered VSV was preferentially sequestered by macrophages in the spleen and liver. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis for total viral RNA on days 2, 7, 21, and 58 showed highest VSV RNA in day 2 samples; highest in spleen, liver, lung, lymph node, kidney, gonad, and bone marrow. No infectious virus was recovered from tissues at any time point. The no observable adverse event level and maximum tolerated dose of VSV-mIFNβ-NIS in C57BL/6 mice are 10(10) TCID50/kg and 5 × 10(10) TCID50/kg, respectively. Clinical translation of VSV-IFNβ-NIS is underway in companion dogs with cancer and in human patients with relapsed hematological malignancies and endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsCells, CulturedDogsFemaleGenetic VectorsHumansInterferon-betaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred ICRMice, SCIDMultiple MyelomaSafetySodium-Iodide SymportersSymportersInterferon-betaSodium-Iodide SymportersSymporters

Identifiers

PMID27532609
PMCPMC5076487
OpenAlexW2521683773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.