ArticlePloS one2016
Plant Growth Promotion and Suppression of Bacterial Leaf Blight in Rice by Inoculated Bacteria.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Application ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- ERF transcription factor StPti5 is a regulator of endophyte community maintenance in potato.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- The PGPB paradox: A critical review of field performance and practical constraints in agriculture.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Review
- Spatial heterogeneity of soil phosphorus influencing bacterial functional adaptations in alkaline calcareous soils.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Trophic interactions in microbiomes influence plant host population size and ecosystem function.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- The biocontrol potentials of rhizospheric bacterium Bacillus velezensis K0T24 against mulberry bacterial wilt disease.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- MicroMPN: methods and software for high-throughput screening of microbe suppression in mixed populations.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- A review on endophytic fungi: a potent reservoir of bioactive metabolites with special emphasis on blight disease management.Archives of microbiology · 2024Review
- Prevalence, diversity and applications potential of nodules endophytic bacteria: a systematic review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Development of bacteria-based bioorganic phosphate fertilizer enriched with rock phosphate for sustainable wheat production.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Exogenous inoculation of endophyteHeliyon · 2023Article
- Exploring the Potentiality of Native Actinobacteria to Combat the Chilli Fruit Rot Pathogens under Post-Harvest Pathosystem.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Plant Growth Promotion and Biocontrol of Leaf Blight Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mitigation of water scarcity with sustained growth of Rice by plant growth promoting bacteria.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Application of Bacterial Endophytes to Control Bacterial Leaf Blight Disease and Promote Rice Growth.The plant pathology journal · 2022Article
- Review
- Antagonistic and plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria againstFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of rice rhizosphere associated antagonistic bacteria for growth promotion and disease suppression of bacterial leaf blight (BLB). A total of 811 rhizospheric bacteria were isolated and screened against 3 prevalent strains of BLB pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) of which five antagonistic bacteria, i.e., Pseudomonas spp. E227, E233, Rh323, Serratia sp. Rh269 and Bacillus sp. Rh219 showed antagonistic potential (zone of inhibition 1-19 mm). Production of siderophores was found to be the common biocontrol determinant and all the strains solubilized inorganic phosphate (82-116 μg mL-1) and produced indole acetic acid (0.48-1.85 mg L-1) in vitro. All antagonistic bacteria were non-pathogenic to rice, and their co-inoculation significantly improved plant health in terms of reduced diseased leaf area (80%), improved shoot length (31%), root length (41%) and plant dry weight (60%) as compared to infected control plants. Furthermore, under pathogen pressure, bacterial inoculation resulted in increased activity of defense related enzymes including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidase, along with 86% increase in peroxidase and 53% increase in catalase enzyme activities in plants inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. Rh323 as well as co-inoculated plants. Bacterial strains showed good colonization potential in the rice rhizosphere up to 21 days after seed inoculation. Application of bacterial consortia in the field resulted in an increase of 31% in grain yield and 10% in straw yield over non-inoculated plots. Although, yield increase was statistically non-significant but was accomplished with overall saving of 20% chemical fertilizers. The study showed that Pseudomonas sp. Rh323 can be used to develop dual-purpose inoculum which can serve not only to suppress BLB but also to promote plant growth in rice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.