Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27532545›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Plant Growth Promotion and Suppression of Bacterial Leaf Blight in Rice by Inoculated Bacteria.

Sumera Yasmin, Abha Zaka, Asma Imran, Muhammad Awais Zahid, Sumaira Yousaf, Ghulam Rasul, Muhammad Arif, Muhammad Sajjad Mirza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Application ofPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Plant Growth Promotion and Biocontrol of Leaf Blight Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sumera YasminNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-6257
Abha ZakaNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Asma ImranNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Awais ZahidNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Sumaira YousafNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ghulam RasulNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ArifNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sajjad MirzaNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan.
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PKNuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the potential of rice rhizosphere associated antagonistic bacteria for growth promotion and disease suppression of bacterial leaf blight (BLB). A total of 811 rhizospheric bacteria were isolated and screened against 3 prevalent strains of BLB pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) of which five antagonistic bacteria, i.e., Pseudomonas spp. E227, E233, Rh323, Serratia sp. Rh269 and Bacillus sp. Rh219 showed antagonistic potential (zone of inhibition 1-19 mm). Production of siderophores was found to be the common biocontrol determinant and all the strains solubilized inorganic phosphate (82-116 μg mL-1) and produced indole acetic acid (0.48-1.85 mg L-1) in vitro. All antagonistic bacteria were non-pathogenic to rice, and their co-inoculation significantly improved plant health in terms of reduced diseased leaf area (80%), improved shoot length (31%), root length (41%) and plant dry weight (60%) as compared to infected control plants. Furthermore, under pathogen pressure, bacterial inoculation resulted in increased activity of defense related enzymes including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and polyphenol oxidase, along with 86% increase in peroxidase and 53% increase in catalase enzyme activities in plants inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. Rh323 as well as co-inoculated plants. Bacterial strains showed good colonization potential in the rice rhizosphere up to 21 days after seed inoculation. Application of bacterial consortia in the field resulted in an increase of 31% in grain yield and 10% in straw yield over non-inoculated plots. Although, yield increase was statistically non-significant but was accomplished with overall saving of 20% chemical fertilizers. The study showed that Pseudomonas sp. Rh323 can be used to develop dual-purpose inoculum which can serve not only to suppress BLB but also to promote plant growth in rice.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsAntibiosisBacillusBiological Control AgentsOryzaPlant DiseasesPseudomonasRhizosphereSerratiaSiderophoresXanthomonasBiological Control AgentsSiderophores

Identifiers

PMID27532545
PMCPMC4988697
OpenAlexW2511648595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.