Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27532364›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2016

Prevalence of ESR1 Mutations in Cell-Free DNA and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BOLERO-2 Clinical Trial.

Sarat Chandarlapaty, David Chen, Wei He, Patricia Sung, Aliaksandra Samoila, Daoqi You, Trusha Bhatt, Parul Patel, Maurizio Voi, Michael Gnant and 3 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 300 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
300citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00863655 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Everolimus in Combination With Exemestane in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Are Refractory to Letrozole or Anastrozole

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2009 to 2014Enrolled724ConditionsBreast CancerArmsEverolimus, Exemestane, Everolimus Placebo
NCT07753954 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Imaging to Re-evaluate Elacestrant Clinical Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorJules Bordet InstituteRan2026 to 2031Enrolled160ConditionsER+ / HER2- Advanced Breast CancerArmsElacestrant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

300 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 485 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Phase I/II Trial of Exemestane, Ribociclib, and Everolimus in Women with HRClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  20. Trial

240 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarat ChandarlapatyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David ChenNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Wei HeNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Patricia SungMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Aliaksandra SamoilaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Daoqi YouMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Trusha BhattMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Parul PatelNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Maurizio VoiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Michael GnantDepartment of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriel HortobagyiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
José BaselgaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mary Ellen MoynahanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNovartis (United States) · USMedical University of Vienna · ATThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEstrogen receptor α (ESR1) mutations found in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) promote ligand-independent receptor activation and resistance to estrogen-deprivation therapy in laboratory models. The prevalence of these mutations and their potential impact on clinical outcomes has not been established.

objectiveTo determine the prevalence of ESR1 mutations (Y537S and D538G) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MBC and determine whether mutation is associated with inferior outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsFrom December 16, 2014, to August 26, 2015, we analyzed cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from baseline plasma samples from participants in the BOLERO-2 double-blind phase 3 study that randomized patients from 189 centers in 24 countries with MBC to exemestane plus placebo or exemestane plus everolimus. The study enrolled postmenopausal women with a diagnosis of MBC and prior exposure to an aromatase inhibitor. Baseline plasma samples were available from 541 of 724 patients (74.7%). We assessed the effect of mutation on overall survival of the population and the effect of mutation on progression-free survival (PFS) by treatment arm.

interventionsPatients were randomized to treatment with exemestane (25 mg oral daily) together with everolimus (10 mg oral daily) or with placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 2 most frequent mutations in ESR1 (Y537S and D538G) were analyzed from cfDNA using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and samples scored as wild-type, D538G, Y537S, or double mutant. Cox-proportional hazards model was used to assess PFS in patient subgroups defined by mutations, and the effect of each mutation on overall survival.

resultsOf 541 evaluable patients, 156 (28.8%) had ESR1 mutation D538G (21.1%) and/or Y537S (13.3%), and 30 had both. These mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (wild-type, 32.1 months [95% CI, 28.09-36.40 months]; D538G, 25.99 months [95% CI, 19.19-32.36 months]; Y537S, 19.98 months [13.01-29.31 months]; both mutations, 15.15 months [95% CI, 10.87-27.43 months]). The D538G group (hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.02-0.57]) derived a similar PFS benefit as wild type from addition of everolimus to exemestane. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ESR1 mutations are prevalent in ER-positive aromatase inhibitor-treated MBC. Both Y537S and D538G mutations are associated with more aggressive disease biology.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00863655.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicMutation, MissenseNeoplasm MetastasisProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDNA, NeoplasmESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID27532364
PMCPMC5063698
OpenAlexW2514365970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.