Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27532336›Full record

ReviewPloS one2016

Leveraging the Social Determinants of Health: What Works?

Lauren A Taylor, Annabel Xulin Tan, Caitlin E Coyle, Chima Ndumele, Erika Rogan, Maureen Canavan, Leslie A Curry, Elizabeth H Bradley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Social Needs Screening Tools for Clinical Populations in Australia and New Zealand: A Scoping Review and Critical Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unmet social needs and diverticulitis: a phenotyping algorithm and cross-sectional analysis.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren A TaylorDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Annabel Xulin TanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Caitlin E CoyleDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Chima NdumeleDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Erika RoganDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Maureen CanavanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Leslie A CurryDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Elizabeth H BradleyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We summarized the recently published, peer-reviewed literature that examined the impact of investments in social services or investments in integrated models of health care and social services on health outcomes and health care spending. Of 39 articles that met criteria for inclusion in the review, 32 (82%) reported some significant positive effects on either health outcomes (N = 20), health care costs (N = 5), or both (N = 7). Of the remaining 7 (18%) studies, 3 had non-significant results, 2 had mixed results, and 2 had negative results in which the interventions were associated with poorer health outcomes. Our analysis of the literature indicates that several interventions in the areas of housing, income support, nutrition support, and care coordination and community outreach have had positive impact in terms of health improvements or health care spending reductions. These interventions may be of interest to health care policymakers and practitioners seeking to leverage social services to improve health or reduce costs. Further testing of models that achieve better outcomes at less cost is needed.

Indexed as

Social Determinants of HealthCommunity-Institutional RelationsHealth Care CostsHealth PolicyHousingHumansIncomeNutrition PolicyOutcome Assessment, Health CareSocial Work

Identifiers

PMID27532336
PMCPMC4988629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.