Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27532298›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Inference of Ancestral Recombination Graphs through Topological Data Analysis.

Pablo G Cámara, Arnold J Levine, Raúl Rabadán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topo-CNN: Retinal Image Analysis with Topological Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Finding maximum common contractions between phylogenetic networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A general and efficient representation of ancestral recombination graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Current Methods for Recombination Detection in Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Methodologies for Microbial Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Global Patterns of Recombination across Human Viruses.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The shape of things to come: Topological data analysis and biology, from molecules to organisms.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2020
    Review
  16. Topological data analysis to model the shape of immune responses during co-infections.Communications in nonlinear science & numerical simulation · 2020
    Article
  17. High-fidelity phenotyping: richness and freedom from bias.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo G CámaraDepartment of Systems Biology and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States of America.
Arnold J LevineThe Simons Center for Systems Biology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Raúl RabadánDepartment of Systems Biology and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Topology of Cancer Evolution and HeterogeneityU54CA193313 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI IAVARONE, ANTONIO, RABADAN, RAUL · 2015 to 2020
$10.4M
Uncovering Evolutionary History using the Topology of Genomic Data with Applications to HIVR01GM117591 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RABADAN, RAUL · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA193313NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent explosion of genomic data has underscored the need for interpretable and comprehensive analyses that can capture complex phylogenetic relationships within and across species. Recombination, reassortment and horizontal gene transfer constitute examples of pervasive biological phenomena that cannot be captured by tree-like representations. Starting from hundreds of genomes, we are interested in the reconstruction of potential evolutionary histories leading to the observed data. Ancestral recombination graphs represent potential histories that explicitly accommodate recombination and mutation events across orthologous genomes. However, they are computationally costly to reconstruct, usually being infeasible for more than few tens of genomes. Recently, Topological Data Analysis (TDA) methods have been proposed as robust and scalable methods that can capture the genetic scale and frequency of recombination. We build upon previous TDA developments for detecting and quantifying recombination, and present a novel framework that can be applied to hundreds of genomes and can be interpreted in terms of minimal histories of mutation and recombination events, quantifying the scales and identifying the genomic locations of recombinations. We implement this framework in a software package, called TARGet, and apply it to several examples, including small migration between different populations, human recombination, and horizontal evolution in finches inhabiting the Galápagos Islands.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyFinchesGene Transfer, HorizontalHumansModels, GeneticPhylogenyRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27532298
PMCPMC4988722
OpenAlexW1528911722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.