Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531976›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling.

Phan Luu, Easwara Moorthy Essaki Arumugam, Erik Anderson, Amanda Gunn, Dennis Rech, Sergei Turovets, Don M Tucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Restoring Attention Networks.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Phan LuuElectrical Geodesics, Inc., EugeneOR, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, EugeneOR, USA.
Easwara Moorthy Essaki ArumugamElectrical Geodesics, Inc., Eugene OR, USA.
Erik AndersonElectrical Geodesics, Inc., Eugene OR, USA.
Amanda GunnElectrical Geodesics, Inc., Eugene OR, USA.
Dennis RechElectrical Geodesics, Inc., Eugene OR, USA.
Sergei TurovetsElectrical Geodesics, Inc., EugeneOR, USA; NeuroInformatics Center, University of Oregon, EugeneOR, USA.
Don M TuckerElectrical Geodesics, Inc., EugeneOR, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, EugeneOR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In pain management as well as other clinical applications of neuromodulation, it is important to consider the timing parameters influencing activity-dependent plasticity, including pulsed versus sustained currents, as well as the spatial action of electrical currents as they polarize the complex convolutions of the cortical mantle. These factors are of course related; studying temporal factors is not possible when the spatial resolution of current delivery to the cortex is so uncertain to make it unclear whether excitability is increased or decreased with anodal vs. cathodal current flow. In the present study we attempted to improve the targeting of specific cortical locations by applying current through flexible source-sink configurations of 256 electrodes in a geodesic array. We constructed a precision electric head model for 12 healthy individuals. Extraction of the individual's cortical surface allowed computation of the component of the induced current that is normal to the target cortical surface. In an effort to replicate the long-term depression (LTD) induced with pulsed protocols in invasive animal research and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, we applied 100 ms pulses at 1.9 s intervals either in cortical-surface-anodal or cortical-surface-cathodal directions, with a placebo (sham) control. The results showed significant LTD of the motor evoked potential as a result of the cortical-surface-cathodal pulses in contrast to the placebo control, with a smaller but similar LTD effect for anodal pulses. The cathodal LTD after-effect was sustained over 90 min following current injection. These results support the feasibility of pulsed protocols with low total charge in non-invasive neuromodulation when the precision of targeting is improved with a dense electrode array and accurate head modeling.

Indexed as

cortical plasticityhead tissue conductivitytranscranial alternating current stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial electrical stimulationtranscranial pulsed current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27531976
PMCPMC4969286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.