ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016
Two distinct mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by the redox sensor YodB.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The MarR family transcription factor SlyA senses iron and respiratory status in enteric bacteria.mBio · 2025Article
- MarR Family Transcriptional Regulators and Their Roles in Plant-Interacting Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- TrmB Family Transcription Factor as a Thiol-Based Regulator of Oxidative Stress Response.mBio · 2022Article
- The two-Cys-type TetR repressor GbaA confers resistance under disulfide and electrophile stress in Staphylococcus aureus.Free radical biology & medicine · 2021Article
- Escherichia coli segments its controls on carbon-dependent gene expression into global and specific regulations.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
- How Bacterial Redox Sensors Transmit Redox Signals via Structural Changes.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Transcriptional Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- The MarR-Type Repressor MhqR Confers Quinone and Antimicrobial Resistance inAntioxidants & redox signaling · 2019Article
- OhsR acts as an organic peroxide-sensing transcriptional activator using an S-mycothiolation mechanism in Corynebacterium glutamicum.Microbial cell factories · 2018Article
- Metallochaperones and metalloregulation in bacteria.Essays in biochemistry · 2017Review
- Entropy redistribution controls allostery in a metalloregulatory protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For bacteria, cysteine thiol groups in proteins are commonly used as thiol-based switches for redox sensing to activate specific detoxification pathways and restore the redox balance. Among the known thiol-based regulatory systems, the MarR/DUF24 family regulators have been reported to sense and respond to reactive electrophilic species, including diamide, quinones, and aldehydes, with high specificity. Here, we report that the prototypical regulator YodB of the MarR/DUF24 family from Bacillus subtilis uses two distinct pathways to regulate transcription in response to two reactive electrophilic species (diamide or methyl-p-benzoquinone), as revealed by X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and biochemical experiments. Diamide induces structural changes in the YodB dimer by promoting the formation of disulfide bonds, whereas methyl-p-benzoquinone allows the YodB dimer to be dissociated from DNA, with little effect on the YodB dimer. The results indicate that B. subtilis may discriminate toxic quinones, such as methyl-p-benzoquinone, from diamide to efficiently manage multiple oxidative signals. These results also provide evidence that different thiol-reactive compounds induce dissimilar conformational changes in the regulator to trigger the separate regulation of target DNA. This specific control of YodB is dependent upon the type of thiol-reactive compound present, is linked to its direct transcriptional activity, and is important for the survival of B. subtilis This study of B. subtilis YodB also provides a structural basis for the relationship that exists between the ligand-induced conformational changes adopted by the protein and its functional switch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.