GuidelineGut2016
UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.
Guideline in Gut, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 151 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Percentage Visualized Mucosa as a Marker for the Quality of Colonoscopy
PROspective Multicentre Study to Identify Diagnostic Key PERfOrmance Indicators in Upper GI Endoscopy (PROSPERO)
Who cites it
151 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of linaclotide plus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in elderly Chinese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Test performance metrics for breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancer screening: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- The contribution of endoscopy quality measures to the development of interval colorectal cancers in the screening population: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- The Effects of Positioning During Colonoscopy on Efficacy and Post-procedure Comfort.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Automatic Quality Control System and Adenoma Detection Rates During Routine Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Trial
- Higher Adenoma Detection Rates at Screening Associated With Lower Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Quality metrics reflecting patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: results of national endoscopy dataset analysis.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2026Observational
- A simple scoring system to estimate adenoma detection rate from polyp detection: a two-center observational study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Defining post-colon capsule endoscopy colorectal cancer (pCCECRC)-an International Capsule Endoscopy Research (iCARE) group consensus statement.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Net Withdrawal Time and Colonoscopy Video Summarization Using Deep Learning Based Automated Temporal Video Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A UK single-center pilot experience using a novel robotic inchworm colonoscopy system.DEN open · 2026Article
- User, expert, and construct validation of a new colonoscopy simulator: correlation with National Endoscopy Database key performance indicators.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2026Article
91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy should be delivered by endoscopists performing high quality procedures. The British Society of Gastroenterology, the UK Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy, and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland have developed quality assurance measures and key performance indicators for the delivery of colonoscopy within the UK. This document sets minimal standards for delivery of procedures along with aspirational targets that all endoscopists should aim for.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.