Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531726›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary critical pathway based on a computerised physician order entry system for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction management in the emergency department: a retrospective observational study.

Yoo Seok Park, Sung Phil Chung, Je Sung You, Min Joung Kim, Hyun Soo Chung, Jung Hwa Hong, Hye Sun Lee, Jinwon Wang, Incheol Park

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Learning from errors: analysis of medication order voiding in CPOE systems.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoo Seok ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Phil ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Je Sung YouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Joung KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Soo ChungDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung Hwa HongDepartment of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Sun LeeDepartment of Research Affairs, Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jinwon WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Incheol ParkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether a multidisciplinary organised critical pathway (CP) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management can significantly attenuate differences in the duration from emergency department (ED) arrival to evaluation and treatment, regardless of the arrival time, by eliminating off-hour and weekend effects.

designRetrospective observational cohort study.

setting2 tertiary academic hospitals.

participantsConsecutive patients in the Fast Interrogation Rule for STEMI (FIRST) program.

interventionsA study was conducted on patients in the FIRST program, which uses a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system. The patient demographics, time intervals and clinical outcomes were analysed based on the arrival time at the ED: group 1, normal working hours on weekdays; group 2, off-hours on weekdays; group 3, normal working hours on weekends; and group 4, off-hours on weekends. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcomes categorised according to 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality and the length of stay.

resultsThe duration from door-to-data or FIRST activation did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. The median duration between arrival and balloon placement during percutaneous coronary intervention did not significantly exceed 90 min, and the proportions (89.6-95.1%) of patients with door-to-balloon times within 90 min did not significantly differ among the 4 groups, regardless of the ED arrival time (p=0.147). Moreover, no differences in the 30-day (p=0.8173) and in-hospital mortality (p=0.9107) were observed in patients with STEMI.

conclusionsA multidisciplinary CP for STEMI based on a CPOE system can effectively decrease disparities in the door-to-data duration and proportions of patients with door-to-balloon times within 90 min, regardless of the ED arrival time. The application of a multidisciplinary CP may also help attenuate off-hour and weekend effects in STEMI clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysEmergency Service, HospitalMedical Order Entry SystemsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ManagementFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamRetrospective StudiesST Elevation Myocardial Infarctionacute myocardial infarctioncomputerized physician order entry systemcritical pathwayemergency medicineweekend effect

Identifiers

PMID27531726
PMCPMC5013344
OpenAlexW2508869593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.