Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cellular adhesome screen identifies critical modulators of focal adhesion dynamics, cellular traction forces and cell migration behaviour.

Michiel Fokkelman, Hayri E Balcıoğlu, Janna E Klip, Kuan Yan, Fons J Verbeek, Erik H J Danen, Bob van de Water

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physical Forces in Glioblastoma Migration: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michiel FokkelmanLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Toxicology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Hayri E BalcıoğluLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Toxicology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Janna E KlipLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Toxicology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Kuan YanImaging &Bioinformatics, Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Fons J VerbeekImaging &Bioinformatics, Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Erik H J DanenLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Toxicology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Bob van de WaterLeiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Toxicology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLCentre for Human Drug Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cells migrate from the primary tumour into surrounding tissue in order to form metastasis. Cell migration is a highly complex process, which requires continuous remodelling and re-organization of the cytoskeleton and cell-matrix adhesions. Here, we aimed to identify genes controlling aspects of tumour cell migration, including the dynamic organization of cell-matrix adhesions and cellular traction forces. In a siRNA screen targeting most cell adhesion-related genes we identified 200+ genes that regulate size and/or dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions in MCF7 breast cancer cells. In a subsequent secondary screen, the 64 most effective genes were evaluated for growth factor-induced cell migration and validated by tertiary RNAi pool deconvolution experiments. Four validated hits showed significantly enlarged adhesions accompanied by reduced cell migration upon siRNA-mediated knockdown. Furthermore, loss of PPP1R12B, HIPK3 or RAC2 caused cells to exert higher traction forces, as determined by traction force microscopy with elastomeric micropillar post arrays, and led to considerably reduced force turnover. Altogether, we identified genes that co-regulate cell-matrix adhesion dynamics and traction force turnover, thereby modulating overall motility behaviour.

Indexed as

Cell MovementGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsExtracellular MatrixFemaleFocal AdhesionsHumansMCF-7 CellsNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27531518
PMCPMC4987721
OpenAlexW2515196970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.