Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531360›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2017

Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension.

Priscila G Brust-Renck, Valerie F Reyna, Evan A Wilhelms, Christopher R Wolfe, Colin L Widmer, Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott, A Kate Morant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of an App to Facilitate Communication and Shared Decision-making With Parents of Febrile Infants ≤ 60 Days Old.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Priscila G Brust-RenckDepartment of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Valerie F ReynaDepartments of Human Development and Psychology, Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell Magnetic Resonance Imaging Facility, and Center for Behavioral Economics and Decision Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. vr53@cornell.edu.
Evan A WilhelmsDepartment of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Christopher R WolfeDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Florida, MI, USA.
Colin L WidmerDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Florida, MI, USA.
Elizabeth M Cedillos-WhynottDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Florida, MI, USA.
A Kate MorantDepartment of Biological Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

The Gist of Hot and Cold Cognition in Adolescents Risky Decision MakingR01NR014368 · NINR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI REYNA, VALERIE FRANCES · 2012 to 2014
$1.8M
A Web Tutor to Help Women Decide About Testing for Genetic Breast Cancer RiskR21CA149796 · NCI · MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD · PI REYNA, VALERIE FRANCES, WOLFE, CHRISTOPHER R · 2011 to 2012
$364k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA149796NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used Sharable Knowledge Objects (SKOs) to create an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory to teach women about obesity prevention: GistFit, getting the gist of healthy eating and exercise. The theory predicts that reliance on gist mental representations (as opposed to verbatim) is more effective in reducing health risks and improving decision making. Technical information was translated into decision-relevant gist representations and gist principles (i.e., healthy values). The SKO was hypothesized to facilitate extracting these gist representations and principles by engaging women in dialogue, "understanding" their responses, and replying appropriately to prompt additional engagement. Participants were randomly assigned to either the obesity prevention tutorial (GistFit) or a control tutorial containing different content using the same technology. Participants were administered assessments of knowledge about nutrition and exercise, gist comprehension, gist principles, behavioral intentions and self-reported behavior. An analysis of engagement in tutorial dialogues and responses to multiple-choice questions to check understanding throughout the tutorial revealed significant correlations between these conversations and scores on subsequent knowledge tests and gist comprehension. Knowledge and comprehension measures correlated with healthier behavior and greater intentions to perform healthy behavior. Differences between GistFit and control tutorials were greater for participants who engaged more fully. Thus, results are consistent with the hypothesis that active engagement with a new gist-based ITS, rather than a passive memorization of verbatim details, was associated with an array of known psychosocial mediators of preventive health decisions, such as knowledge acquisition, and gist comprehension.

Indexed as

ComprehensionDiet, HealthyExerciseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternetAdolescentComputer-Assisted InstructionDecision MakingFemaleHumansObesityPatient Education as TopicYoung AdultFuzzy-Trace TheoryGistHealthIntelligent Tutoring SystemObesity

Identifiers

PMID27531360
PMCPMC5313384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.