Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531212›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2016

[Evidence-based rehabilitation of mobility after stroke].

C Dohle, R Tholen, H Wittenberg, J Quintern, S Saal, K M Stephan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C DohleMEDIAN Klinik Berlin-Kladow, Kladower Damm 223, 14089, Berlin, Deutschland. christian.dohle@median-kliniken.de.
R TholenPhysio Deutschland - Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie (ZVK), Köln, Deutschland.
H WittenbergSt. Mauritius Therapieklinik, Meerbusch, Deutschland.
J QuinternMedical Park Loipl, Bischofswiesen, Deutschland.
S SaalInstitut für Gesundheits- und Pflegewissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Deutschland.
K M StephanSt. Mauritius Therapieklinik, Meerbusch, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately two thirds of stroke patients initially suffer from at least impaired mobility. Various rehabilitation concepts have been proposed.

objectiveBased on the current literature, which rehabilitation methods can be recommended for improvement of gait, gait velocity, gait distance and balance?

methodsA systematic literature search was carried out for randomized clinical studies and reviews with clinically relevant outcome variables. Formulation of recommendations, separated for target variables and time after stroke.

resultsRestoration and improvement of gait function relies on a high number of repetitions of gait movements, which for more severely affected patients is preferentially machine-based. For improvement of gait velocity for less severely affected patients intensive gait training does not necessarily rely on mechanical support. Gait distance can be improved by aerobic endurance exercises with a cardiovascular effect, which have to be performed in a functional context. Improvement of balance should be achieved by intensive functional gait training. Additional stimulation techniques are only effective when included in a functionally relevant training program. DISCUSSION: These guidelines not only provide recommendations for action but also provide pathophysiological insights into functional restoration of stance and gait after stroke.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationEvidence-Based MedicineExercise TherapyGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeBalanceGaitGuidelinesNeurorehabilitationPhysiotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.