ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Corpus domain effects on distributional semantic modeling of medical terms.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Relatedness and Stability of vigiVec Semantic Vector Representations of Adverse Events and Drugs in Pharmacovigilance.Drug safety · 2025Article
- ARCH: Large-scale knowledge graph via aggregated narrative codified health records analysis.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Extracting Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches in Electronic Health Records.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Article
- Biomedical Text Classification Using Augmented Word Representation Based on Distributional and Relational Contexts.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Validating the representation of distance between infarct diseases using word embedding.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Improving medical term embeddings using UMLS Metathesaurus.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- A Comparison of Natural Language Processing Methods for the Classification of Lumbar Spine Imaging Findings Related to Lower Back Pain.Academic radiology · 2022Article
- Context Matters: Recovering Human Semantic Structure from Machine Learning Analysis of Large-Scale Text Corpora.Cognitive science · 2022Article
- Word embeddings trained on published case reports are lightweight, effective for clinical tasks, and free of protected health information.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2022Article
- The Application of Projection Word Embeddings on Medical Records Scoring System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A fast, resource efficient, and reliable rule-based system for COVID-19 symptom identification.JAMIA open · 2021Article
- A Word Pair Dataset for Semantic Similarity and Relatedness in Korean Medical Vocabulary: Reference Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Automated Coding of Under-Studied Medical Concept Domains: Linking Physical Activity Reports to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Intrinsic Evaluation of Contextual and Non-contextual Word Embeddings using Radiology Reports.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
- Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE): A hybrid multi-ontology and corpus-based semantic representation model for biomedical concepts.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Article
- Use of word and graph embedding to measure semantic relatedness between Unified Medical Language System concepts.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Semantic Deep Learning: Prior Knowledge and a Type of Four-Term Embedding Analogy to Acquire Treatments for Well-Known Diseases.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Natural language processing of prehospital emergency medical services trauma records allows for automated characterization of treatment appropriateness.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAutomatically quantifying semantic similarity and relatedness between clinical terms is an important aspect of text mining from electronic health records, which are increasingly recognized as valuable sources of phenotypic information for clinical genomics and bioinformatics research. A key obstacle to development of semantic relatedness measures is the limited availability of large quantities of clinical text to researchers and developers outside of major medical centers. Text from general English and biomedical literature are freely available; however, their validity as a substitute for clinical domain to represent semantics of clinical terms remains to be demonstrated.
resultsWe constructed neural network representations of clinical terms found in a publicly available benchmark dataset manually labeled for semantic similarity and relatedness. Similarity and relatedness measures computed from text corpora in three domains (Clinical Notes, PubMed Central articles and Wikipedia) were compared using the benchmark as reference. We found that measures computed from full text of biomedical articles in PubMed Central repository (rho = 0.62 for similarity and 0.58 for relatedness) are on par with measures computed from clinical reports (rho = 0.60 for similarity and 0.57 for relatedness). We also evaluated the use of neural network based relatedness measures for query expansion in a clinical document retrieval task and a biomedical term word sense disambiguation task. We found that, with some limitations, biomedical articles may be used in lieu of clinical reports to represent the semantics of clinical terms and that distributional semantic methods are useful for clinical and biomedical natural language processing applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software and reference standards used in this study to evaluate semantic similarity and relatedness measures are publicly available as detailed in the article. CONTACT: pakh0002@umn.eduSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.