Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27531100›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Corpus domain effects on distributional semantic modeling of medical terms.

Serguei V S Pakhomov, Greg Finley, Reed McEwan, Yan Wang, Genevieve B Melton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Improving medical term embeddings using UMLS Metathesaurus.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Serguei V S PakhomovCollege of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Greg FinleyInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Reed McEwanInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Yan WangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Genevieve B MeltonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Funding

Sematic Relatedness for Active Medication Safety and Outcomes SurveillanceR01LM009623 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAKHOMOV, SERGUEI VS · 2008 to 2010
$949k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAutomatically quantifying semantic similarity and relatedness between clinical terms is an important aspect of text mining from electronic health records, which are increasingly recognized as valuable sources of phenotypic information for clinical genomics and bioinformatics research. A key obstacle to development of semantic relatedness measures is the limited availability of large quantities of clinical text to researchers and developers outside of major medical centers. Text from general English and biomedical literature are freely available; however, their validity as a substitute for clinical domain to represent semantics of clinical terms remains to be demonstrated.

resultsWe constructed neural network representations of clinical terms found in a publicly available benchmark dataset manually labeled for semantic similarity and relatedness. Similarity and relatedness measures computed from text corpora in three domains (Clinical Notes, PubMed Central articles and Wikipedia) were compared using the benchmark as reference. We found that measures computed from full text of biomedical articles in PubMed Central repository (rho = 0.62 for similarity and 0.58 for relatedness) are on par with measures computed from clinical reports (rho = 0.60 for similarity and 0.57 for relatedness). We also evaluated the use of neural network based relatedness measures for query expansion in a clinical document retrieval task and a biomedical term word sense disambiguation task. We found that, with some limitations, biomedical articles may be used in lieu of clinical reports to represent the semantics of clinical terms and that distributional semantic methods are useful for clinical and biomedical natural language processing applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software and reference standards used in this study to evaluate semantic similarity and relatedness measures are publicly available as detailed in the article. CONTACT: pakh0002@umn.eduSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Data MiningSemanticsUnified Medical Language SystemHumansNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerPubMedReference StandardsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID27531100
PMCPMC5181540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.